Many thanks Mikey ..

A couple of remarks:

- I think slide 6 is supposed to replace slide 5, right? i.e. slide 5 will be deleted, right?

- I believe we should be adding the Wiki url, unless this is going to be the one added to reference the charter

- Finally, on slide 6, I think the 2^nd and 3^rd bullets are redundant .. I suggest keeping the 2^nd and deleting the 3^rd , don’t know what you and other colleagues think .. I think the GNSO and GAC providing feedback, implicitly means they approve the new version reflecting such feedback ..

And finally to answer your question “what’s the goal for having the charter approved by the GAC and the GNSO?” I personally believe that:

- It’s important to consult at each milestone, as indicated in our charter

- It’s important to make sure both the GAC and the GNSO agree to the problem definition, the described objectives and the expected deliverables

- Having everyone agree on each significant step means that they will be ready to adopt our deliverables at the end (some sort of early engagement ;) )

Not sure what my GAC colleagues think, but I don’t think we will receive the sought feedback/approval from the GAC at the meeting in Singapore, that’s why it was suggested to agree on a deadline ..

I hope I was able to address your points .. if not please let me know ..

Kind Regards

--Manal

From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2014 6:20 PM
To: gac-gnso-cgs@icann.org
Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] revised version of the slide deck -- still plenty oftime for revisions before our next meeting

hi all,

here’s a next-version of the slides. the big unanswered question that we probably can take into the meeting in Singapore is “what’s the goal for having the charter approved by the GAC and the GNSO?” we might want to have a proposed answer to that question. on the GNSO side, i bet we could approve it in Singapore. GAC folks? what do you think? too fast?

anyway, here’s the deck. feel free to revise/comment. Manal, i left the slide you added in the deck, followed by my revised version in the black font. see if you like my version.

mikey