Many thanks Suzanne ..
As you may have noticed, following our last call, the slides have been significantly reduced ..
May I ask if you can share the below important questions through an intervention .. We can agree on a point where we can pass you the floor to share the below ..
Does this sound reasonable?
Kind Regards
--Manal
From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Suzanne Radell
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 8:08 PM
To: Jonathan Robinson; GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Meeting Agenda - October 7th 2014
Hi all, I’ve inserted some comments in the slide deck for LA for your consideration. In connection with them, I’ve drafted the following questions to be put to the GAC membership in LA as well; please let me know if they are in line with your recent discussions, which I have regrettably not been able to join. My sense is that the questions could be raised either during or after the three slides labeled “Early Awareness” and I’d be happy to handle this if you haven’t already determined a lead. Thanks in advance for your feedback and see you soon, Suz
1. Based on the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group’s assessment of the survey results, it seems clear that more information is needed from the GAC membership as to the type and frequency of material that would assist the GAC in arriving at an early and better understanding of what issues pending before the GNSO require GAC attention. The GAC-GNSO Consultation Group would ask GAC members to share their thoughts regarding the specific suggestions outlined in the slide deck: do they provide a good starting point?
2. Noting that two of the concerns raised in the survey relate to both the volume of work and confusion as to the timeframe for contributions, would it make sense to experiment with an approach that identifies those issues that are just at the beginning stage in the GNSO (e.g. the initial Issues Report)?
3. If the GAC were to create some form of “quick look” mechanism, what is the best way to do that? Should we implement the suggestions proposed and determine, by the next ICANN/GAC meeting, whether implementing these suggestions meets the GAC’s needs?
4. Or should we consider creating a GAC-GNSO working group that would help share the responsibility for monitoring GNSO developments among a larger number of GAC members?
Suzanne Murray Radell
Senior Policy Advisor, NTIA/OIA
202-482-3167
From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 7:14 AM
To: GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Meeting Agenda - October 7th 2014
Please see attached for a draft of the presentation for 2a
Jonathan
From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com]
Sent: 07 October 2014 12:13
To: GAC-GNSO-CG@icann.org
Subject: Meeting Agenda - October 7th 2014
All,
Having talked with Manal, Marika & Olof, it seems we need to cover the following:
1. Review Agenda
2. Content of the GNSO / GAC Meeting
a. Presentation – Structure, content & objectives
b. Input from Mason Cole
3. Agenda for the face to face meeting of the CG
4. AOB
Look forward to seeing you at 13h00 UTC today.
Jonathan