Dear All .. Reference to the above mentioned subject and the attached documents, appreciate your feedback on whether we can share: 1. Active GNSO WGs; Can I share the 'Active GNSO WGs' with GAC colleagues? The attached version already includes Mikey's suggestion to switch order a d start with the brief summary of all active WGs categorized by phase .. Any objections? Does this version still hold, it's almost a week old? 2. Mechanism for day-to-day co-operation; Can we share the mentioned objectives, expectations and options to be considered? If colleagues feel the document (even with an empty table) is pre-mature to share, we can think of sharing bullet-listing of objectives, expectations and options to be considered, without sharing the whole document .. The objective is to consult and to seek wider approval if we do not have current intentions to change or modify .. Jonathan, please let me know if I have overlooked anything .. Looking forward to receiving your earliest feedback on the above .. Kind Regards --Manal From: gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gac-gnso-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Manal Ismail Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 8:07 PM To: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: [Gac-gnso-cg] Agenda for Tues. Feb. 25th cc .. Dear All .. Please find below the suggested agenda for tomorrow's conference call .. 1. Day-to-day work track (Working document prepared by Marika and Olof - Version circulated by Marika on Feb. 20th, 2014) 2. PDP work track (Working document prepared by Mikey and Suzanne - Version circulated by Mikey on Feb. 20th, 2014) 3. Agree on material ready to be shared in preparation for Singapore o Active GNSO WGs (attached) o Mechanism for day-to-day co-operation (attached version - with unpopulated table) 4. Agree on expectations from both work tracks for the following call (Note: Next call scheduled for 11 March 2014, 14h00 UTC) 5. AOB All referenced documents are attached for your convenience .. Kind Regards --Manal
On 26 Feb 2014, at 12:31 am, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear All ..
Reference to the above mentioned subject and the attached documents, appreciate your feedback on whether we can share:
1. Active GNSO WGs; Can I share the 'Active GNSO WGs' with GAC colleagues? The attached version already includes Mikey’s suggestion to switch order a d start with the brief summary of all active WGs categorized by phase .. Any objections?
I don't think there would be any problem with sharing it - the WGs are all very public, the information about their current status would be easily extractable from public sources.
Does this version still hold, it’s almost a week old?
You obviously have a quite optimistic idea of how fast GNSO working groups move :-) Regards David
Thanks David .. noted .. Yes I thought maybe things might have developed over this week J !! Will be sharing it with the GAC and will keep our group posted on any feedback that we could use to further fine tune our proposals .. Kind Regards --Manal From: David Cake [mailto:dave@difference.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:45 PM To: Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] Agree on material ready to be shared .. On 26 Feb 2014, at 12:31 am, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote: Dear All .. Reference to the above mentioned subject and the attached documents, appreciate your feedback on whether we can share: 1. Active GNSO WGs; Can I share the 'Active GNSO WGs' with GAC colleagues? The attached version already includes Mikey's suggestion to switch order a d start with the brief summary of all active WGs categorized by phase .. Any objections? I don't think there would be any problem with sharing it - the WGs are all very public, the information about their current status would be easily extractable from public sources. Does this version still hold, it's almost a week old? You obviously have a quite optimistic idea of how fast GNSO working groups move :-) Regards David
participants (2)
-
David Cake -
Manal Ismail