Dear Jonathan .. Dear All .. As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday's GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight: - That the survey is short - our to receive further GAC responses - that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday: - further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations) - remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide .. Hope it's ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th .. Kind Regards --Manal
Thanks Manal, I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison’s work going forward. Thanks again. Amr On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan .. Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday’s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight: - That the survey is short - our to receive further GAC responses - that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday: - further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations) - remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it’s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards --Manal _______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thanks, Agreed, I can see no harm in that - Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th? Thank-you Manal for raising it again. Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Thanks Manal, I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison's work going forward. Thanks again. Amr On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote: Dear Jonathan .. Dear All .. As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday's GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight: - That the survey is short - our to receive further GAC responses - that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday: - further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations) - remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide .. Hope it's ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th .. Kind Regards --Manal _______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know .. Kind Regards --Manal Sent from my iPhone On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote: Thanks, Agreed, I can see no harm in that – Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th? Thank-you Manal for raising it again. Jonathan From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Thanks Manal, I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison’s work going forward. Thanks again. Amr On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote: Dear Jonathan .. Dear All .. As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday’s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight: - That the survey is short - our to receive further GAC responses - that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday: - further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations) - remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide .. Hope it’s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th .. Kind Regards --Manal _______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
Dear All, I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24. Best regards, Marika On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Dear All, I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24. Best regards, Marika On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Indeed great news .. Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have responded and share with them the new number !! Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample. Jonathan -----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Dear All, I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24. Best regards, Marika On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thanks, Manal. Looking at the responses to date, it would also be good if you could encourage respondents to provide any ideas / suggestions they may have for improvements. The open ended questions have only gotten up to 5 responses per question and those are where I think we'll probably get the most important feedback. Best regards, Marika On 04/08/14 11:42, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Indeed great news .. Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have responded and share with them the new number !! Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample.
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Dear All,
I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24.
Best regards,
Marika
On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Thanks Marika .. good suggestion .. will do .. I hope we will have more responses to this question in future responses but those who have already responded cannot re-edit their responses, right? Just to make sure I have an answer, if asked .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:48 AM To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Thanks, Manal. Looking at the responses to date, it would also be good if you could encourage respondents to provide any ideas / suggestions they may have for improvements. The open ended questions have only gotten up to 5 responses per question and those are where I think we'll probably get the most important feedback. Best regards, Marika On 04/08/14 11:42, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Indeed great news .. Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have responded and share with them the new number !! Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample.
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Dear All,
I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24.
Best regards,
Marika
On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Yes, that is correct. But as you noted below, anyone should feel encouraged to send any ideas / suggestions they may have as well by email so we can consider those together with the survey responses. Best regards, Marika On 04/08/14 12:08, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Thanks Marika .. good suggestion .. will do .. I hope we will have more responses to this question in future responses but those who have already responded cannot re-edit their responses, right? Just to make sure I have an answer, if asked ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:48 AM To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks, Manal. Looking at the responses to date, it would also be good if you could encourage respondents to provide any ideas / suggestions they may have for improvements. The open ended questions have only gotten up to 5 responses per question and those are where I think we'll probably get the most important feedback.
Best regards,
Marika
On 04/08/14 11:42, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Indeed great news .. Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have responded and share with them the new number !! Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample.
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Dear All,
I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24.
Best regards,
Marika
On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
Great .. Thanks .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 11:14 AM To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey .. Yes, that is correct. But as you noted below, anyone should feel encouraged to send any ideas / suggestions they may have as well by email so we can consider those together with the survey responses. Best regards, Marika On 04/08/14 12:08, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Thanks Marika .. good suggestion .. will do .. I hope we will have more responses to this question in future responses but those who have already responded cannot re-edit their responses, right? Just to make sure I have an answer, if asked ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:48 AM To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks, Manal. Looking at the responses to date, it would also be good if you could encourage respondents to provide any ideas / suggestions they may have for improvements. The open ended questions have only gotten up to 5 responses per question and those are where I think we'll probably get the most important feedback.
Best regards,
Marika
On 04/08/14 11:42, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Indeed great news .. Thanks for the update .. will make sure to thank GAC colleagues who have responded and share with them the new number !! Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:12 AM To: 'Marika Konings'; Manal Ismail Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Great. That's good to hear. Starts to feel like meaningful data / a good sample.
Jonathan
-----Original Message----- From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@icann.org] Sent: 04 August 2014 08:41 To: Manal Ismail; Jonathan Robinson Cc: gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Dear All,
I'm happy to report that the reminders are having an impact as we've already gone from 7 responses to 24.
Best regards,
Marika
On 02/08/14 11:27, "Manal Ismail" <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Many thanks Amr and Jonathan for your replies .. Glad we all share the same view 'the more feedback, the more helpful it would be' .. Jonathan, the extension requested was till the end of the month, which I understood as Aug 31st .. But if colleagues see Aug 27th is more appropriate for a certain reason(s), please let me know ..
Kind Regards --Manal
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 1, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com> wrote:
Thanks,
Agreed, I can see no harm in that Are we proposing to leave it as long as 27th?
Thank-you Manal for raising it again.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@egyptig.org] Sent: 01 August 2014 13:10 To: Manal Ismail Cc: jonathan.robinson@ipracon.com; gac-gnso-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gac-gnso-cg] GAC Survey ..
Thanks Manal,
I thought we agreed to extend the deadline for one week past the end of July during our last call. I have no objection to extending it further (until August 27th). The more feedback we get, the more helpful it will ultimately be. I suppose the results of the survey will also be helpful to the upcoming GAC/GNSO reverse liaison¹s work going forward.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Aug 1, 2014, at 1:55 PM, Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg> wrote:
Dear Jonathan ..
Dear All ..
As promised on our last conference call, Suzanne, Mark and myself brought to GAC colleagues attention, on yesterday¹s GAC conference call, the survey to assess the GAC's familiarity with current GNSO mechanisms .. We made sure to highlight:
- That the survey is short
- our to receive further GAC responses
- that the deadline has been extended till July 31st , and was due yesterday
and would like to update consultation group colleagues on the feedback received yesterday:
- further extension of the deadline was requested (till end of August to accommodate summer vacations)
- remarks that the survey is not easy to fill, despite its shortness
I have also offered to GAC members to send any feedback, in that context, over email if they feel the survey questions do not cover what the feedback they would like to provide ..
Hope it¹s ok to further extend the survey deadline, particularly that our next conference call is not until Aug. 27th ..
Kind Regards
--Manal
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org <mailto:Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg>
_______________________________________________ Gac-gnso-cg mailing list Gac-gnso-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gac-gnso-cg
participants (4)
-
Amr Elsadr -
Jonathan Robinson -
Manal Ismail -
Marika Konings