Thanks, Mary!

Do others in the group have thoughts on these points?

Thanks!

Amy

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Margie Milam
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 8:26 PM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]

Hi Amy & All-

Here are additional comments on the IP Framework:

What is the justification for charging? (see: Section 1.2.3. Assessing a nominal cost-recovery fee for processing complaint submissions, or to maintain Requester account so long as this does not serve as an unreasonable barrier to access to the process). Since there was no support on the IRT for requiring manual review of requests, perhaps there is no longer a need to charge a fee for submitting requests.
Section 1.2 - There should be an appeal process built in (just like registrars are afforded when “adversely affected”) – especially where the Provider can revoke or block Requester access to the submission tool …
Section 2.1.6.1 and 2.2.7.1- Requiring the rights holder to state that “is not defensible: is an improper standard because anyone can “claim a defense”
Section 3.3.4 – if the disclosure is refused, and the customer has surrendered the name, how does the rights holder identify who and where to sue for past infringement? Are the providers to be sued in lieu of the customer?

All the best,

Margie

From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org>
Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Date: Friday, August 25, 2017 at 7:54 AM
To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]

Dear Colleagues,

I’m able to confirm that we will be discussing data escrow on next week’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call (29 August). We will also be discussing the RDDS labeling specification in the PPAA draft v1. We don’t have draft text to show you yet on data escrow—we want to talk through a few issues first to ensure we are on the right track before finalizing proposed text. We will have members of ICANN’s technical services team on the call to discuss.

Also, this is a reminder to please complete the linked poll related to the LEA framework, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG no later than this upcoming Monday, 28 August. In addition, please send any additional input on the topics discussed this week and any additional suggestions for sections of the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list.

Thanks, and have a great weekend!

Amy

Amy E. Bivins

Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104

Email: amy.bivins@icann.org

www.icann.org

From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:00 AM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Notes, Action Items from 22 August PP IRT Call [PLEASE complete poll]

Hello, All,

Thanks so much for your active participation on yesterday’s Privacy/Proxy IRT call. For those of you would could not attend, I encourage you to please listen to the recording, available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/22+August+2017.

Several action items resulted from this meeting:

IRT: Please complete this linked poll regarding the proposed edit to the LEA framework, specification 4 of the draft PPAA, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/2F5BGBG, no later than next Monday, 28 August. Please read the background before the first question carefully.
- The IRT discussion on this topic yesterday continued to demonstrate a division among the group regarding this proposed edit. The results of this poll will not be counted as a vote but are intended to ensure that we have a complete record and understanding of all IRT participants’ opinions on this topic. This is important. Please participate. There are only two substantive questions.
IRT: Please provide any additional feedback no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “record-keeping” topic, issue 24 on the issues list.
IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the IP framework (issue 20 on the issues list), particularly the issue raised on the call, regarding the proposed addition of language from the framework’s introduction in the Final Report.
IRT: Please provide any additional feedback you have no later than Monday, 28 August, on the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft (issue 25 on the issues list).
ICANN will review the “business dealings” section of the PPAA draft, per IRT feedback, to ensure that the language (when read in consultation with the rest of the contract) will not result in duplicative notice requirements (ie, customers should receive one notice (e.g. data accuracy notices), either from the provider or registrar—not both).

Finally, you will notice that we are moving fairly quickly to the end of the issues list (albeit with many action items to follow up on). Please send any additional points related to the PPAA draft that you would like to discuss to the list. Once we reach the end of the issues list, if we have no further suggestions from you, we will move on to other topics.

For next week’s call, we are planning to discuss data escrow and RDDS labeling. I will confirm this by Monday morning Eastern Time at the latest (we are currently working to finalize an updated draft specification for your review).

Best,