13 Dec 2024: IRT Task due Date.
19 Dec 2024: IRT Meeting Date
Thanks Brian, Reg, and those making comments on the doc for TQ A.
The topic is “Changes to Definition Language.”
I’d like the IRT to consider beyond the Principled position of NO CHANGE at ALL.
At the lowest level of change are the typos and grammar. Then word changes to reflect currency and clarity etc.
We will need to create our own draft of the definition for our implementation.
Could this be done without making any changes?
For example, we can look at the work done by the 2016 IRT here.
|
Final Report Definition |
P/P AA Definition |
|
"Privacy Service" means a service by which a Registered Name is registered to its beneficial user as the Registered Name Holder,
but for which alternative, reliable contact information is provided by
the privacy or proxy service provider for display of the Registered Name Holder's contact information in the Registration Data Service (WHOIS) or equivalent services. |
1.24 “Privacy Service” means a service by which a Registered Name is registered to
a Customer as the Registered Name Holder, but for which alternative, reliable contact information is provided by
Provider for display in the Registration Data Directory Service rather than the Customer’s contact information in the Registration Data Directory Service. |
Please complete this task this week.
|
Task# |
IRT Tasks (Homework) |
Due Date |
|
20241205 |
TQ A. Provide feedback to on Draft Language for
IRT Threshold Questions for GNSO Council Guidance. |
13 Dec 2024 |
Thanks you!
Dennis Chang
From:
BECKHAM Brian <brian.beckham@wipo.int>
Date: Thursday, December 5, 2024 at 11:14 PM
To: "PPSAI IRT members, including observers" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Cc: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, Reg Levy <rlevy@tucows.com>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Re: IRT Task 20241205: TQ.A: Provide feedback to on Draft Language for IRT Threshold Questions for GNSO Council Guidance. Due: 13 Dec 2024
Hi Reg, Denis, all,
I have added a comment in the document (I may be misunderstanding the relation here, but question 2 seems to be linked to question 1, and question 3 flows from that connection).
Please can we also attribute the “concerns and inputs” to individuals to give them context.
More fundamentally however, we seem to be missing the core question of whether subsequent events (e.g., GDPR and NIS2) somehow “overtake” the PPSAI recommendations such that
they need to be reconsidered in whole or in part. Perhaps that is the gist of question 3, but it is not immediately clear to me if that is the case.
I also think questions such as “would this require a new contract” or things to that effect are beyond the scope of this IRT and need not be asked here.
Brian
PS, it may only be me, but there still seems to be an issue with the mtg ICS invites.
From: Reg Levy via Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 10:56 PM
To: PPSAI IRT members, including observers <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Cc: Dennis S. Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>; Reg Levy <rlevy@tucows.com>
Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Re: IRT Task 20241205: TQ.A: Provide feedback to on Draft Language for IRT Threshold Questions for GNSO Council Guidance. Due: 13 Dec 2024
Dennis—
Thank you! I’ve made some comments/edits to the document. There is no confusion about who the party responsible for the domain is—it is the registrant, in all cases. Where a service is affiliated with a registrar, the registrar has that
information (and no other). Where a service is not affiliated with a registrar, that service is the registrant, whether or not it is apparent that a service exists.
I’m pretty sure only the first question needs to be asked. The second two questions assume that the IRT can subvert the PDP by creating policy, which is the job of the working group, not of the IRT. Or of Council.
Servus,
Reg
--
Reg Levy | Associate General Counsel – Domains
+1 (323) 880-0831
Tucows #MakingTheInternetBetter
UTC -8