13 Dec 2024: IRT Task due Date.
19 Dec 2024: IRT Meeting Date
Thanks Brian, Reg, and those making comments on the doc for TQ A.
The topic is “Changes to Definition Language.”
I’d like the IRT to consider beyond the Principled position of NO CHANGE at ALL.
At the lowest level of change are the typos and grammar. Then word changes to reflect currency and clarity etc.
We will need to create our own draft of the definition for our implementation.
Could this be done without making any changes?
For example, we can look at the work done by the 2016 IRT here.
Final Report Definition | P/P AA Definition |
"Privacy Service" means a service by which a Registered Name is registered to its beneficial user as the Registered Name Holder, but for which alternative, reliable contact information is provided by the privacy or proxy service provider for display of the Registered Name Holder's contact information in the Registration Data Service (WHOIS) or equivalent services. | 1.24 “Privacy Service” means a service by which a Registered Name is registered to a Customer as the Registered Name Holder, but for which alternative, reliable contact information is provided by Provider for display in the Registration Data Directory Service rather than the Customer’s contact information in the Registration Data Directory Service. |
Please complete this task this week.
Task# | IRT Tasks (Homework) | Due Date |
20241205 | | 13 Dec 2024 |
Dennis Chang
Hi Reg, Denis, all,
I have added a comment in the document (I may be misunderstanding the relation here, but question 2 seems to be linked to question 1, and question 3 flows from that connection).
Please can we also attribute the “concerns and inputs” to individuals to give them context.
More fundamentally however, we seem to be missing the core question of whether subsequent events (e.g., GDPR and NIS2) somehow “overtake” the PPSAI recommendations such that they need to be reconsidered in whole or in part. Perhaps that is the gist of question 3, but it is not immediately clear to me if that is the case.
I also think questions such as “would this require a new contract” or things to that effect are beyond the scope of this IRT and need not be asked here.
Brian
PS, it may only be me, but there still seems to be an issue with the mtg ICS invites.
Dennis—
Thank you! I’ve made some comments/edits to the document. There is no confusion about who the party responsible for the domain is—it is the registrant, in all cases. Where a service is affiliated with a registrar, the registrar has that information (and no other). Where a service is not affiliated with a registrar, that service is the registrant, whether or not it is apparent that a service exists.
I’m pretty sure only the first question needs to be asked. The second two questions assume that the IRT can subvert the PDP by creating policy, which is the job of the working group, not of the IRT. Or of Council.
Reg
Reg Levy | Associate General Counsel – Domains
Tucows #MakingTheInternetBetter
UTC -8
Thanks to those communicating to us about the missing calendar invitation for today’s meeting.
Per your suggestion, we cancelled today’s meeting,
Our team here is double checking the tool and process on our side and will refresh the invitations going forward.
I addition, we will take up on the offer by a some of you to help us test early to confirm the receipt of the calendar invitations on your side.
Below is a task, I had intended to assign at the meeting today with explanation.
We did not meet but it’s important that we don’t lose momentum, so we’ll go ahead and start this work via this email.
When you open the document, you will see the “About” and “Instructions” which I hope will sufficiently explain your task.
Please don’t hesitate to ask if you’d like further info.
One note about the expand/collapse heading feature.
You may see only the headers when you open the document. Please note “>” or “v” appeal when you place your curser over the Section header.
You’ll see a message “Expand Heading” or “Collapse Heading” that you can click on to reveal or hide the content of the section.
I find this new feature very helpful in orienting and organizing our work and I’d like us to use it.
At this time of this email, you’ll see TQ A populated with the Draft Language for Questions to GNSO with the “Status: Initial draft review by IRT (5 Dec 2024)”
TQ B below is also there being set up with the status “ICANN org drafting.”
We plan to issue separate tasks for each TQ work to keep us together as we move forward.
Thank you all for your continued support and contribution.
Our staff here felt very badly about what happened with the calendar meeting invites but also remarked how cooperative, flexible, and understanding the IRT is working with us a team and even encouraging us.
We indeed have the most excellent IRT. Thank you!
_______________________________________________
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list -- gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
World Intellectual Property Organization Disclaimer: This electronic message may contain privileged, confidential and copyright protected information. If you have received this e-mail by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail and all its attachments. Please ensure all e-mail attachments are scanned for viruses prior to opening or using.