Regarding Section 3.5.4.1, what if we used language that provided some
flexibility regarding the time frame? For example:
A Customer's willful provision of inaccurate or unreliable
information, its willful failure to update information provided to
Provider within seven (7) days of any change, OR ITS FAILURE TO
RESPOND TO PROVIDER INQUIRIES WITHIN THE TIME FRAME REQUIRED BY
PROVIDER’S TOS (NOT TO EXCEED (15) DAYS) concerning the accuracy of
contact details associated with the Registered Name for which Provider
is providing the Services constitute a material breach of the service
agreement between such Customer and Provider and be a basis for
suspension or cancellation of the Services.
POLICY MANAGER | GODADDY™
_This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use
only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential
information. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and
any copy of this message and its attachments._
DATE: Tuesday, August 1, 2017 at 12:32 PM
SUBJECT: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Updates, action items following 1
Thanks so much for your active participation on today’s Privacy/Proxy
IRT call. We made a lot of progress. If you were unable to attend, the
recording and materials are available on the wiki,
I’ve updated the issues list (attached) for the topics discussed today
(Issues 5, 6, 9, 10, 13) based on your feedback.
* Please provide any additional input you have on issues 5, 6, 9, 10,
and 13 NO LATER THAN NEXT MONDAY, 7 AUGUST. In particular, please
consider the following questions that arose during today’s meeting:
* Regarding issue 6 (Section 3.5.4.1 of the draft PPAA), should we
consider reducing the required period from 15 days to some shortened
period? If yes, do you have recommendations for what the shortened
* Regarding issue 13 (PPAA section 5.7.1): (i) Is it feasible for a
registrar to block new registrations from a suspended provider
(provided that provider is identified by its ICANN ID during the
registration process)? (IRT input on this point has been mixed); (ii)
If the answer to (i) is yes, is any additional language required with
respect to Point 5 raised during the call (“sounds like we need an EPP
* Please complete the IRT poll re: data escrow and additional PPAA
discussion topics no later than Friday, 4 August,
Next week, we plan to discuss Issues 4 and 23(data retention), 12
(accreditation term), 15 (Customer Data Accuracy Spec), 17-19 (LEA
Specification). We will discuss data retention and the LEA
specification first, to ensure we can discuss both of these while we
have our PSWG colleagues on the call.
Thanks in advance for your continued consideration of the issues
discussed today and your completion of the poll. If you have questions
or comments before our next meeting, please send them to the list.
Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
Registrar Services and Industry Relations
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
_______________________________________________
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list