Hello, All,

At our next PP IRT meeting, we will discuss the following:

LEA Framework Specification:
- Remaining issue re: time period for actioning high priority requests. If no agreement is reached this will be flagged for the public comment period. We will discuss most recent suggestions made on the list and determine whether there is an IRT consensus to adopt any of these proposed changes.
- Question from ICANN about Section 6.3’s application to Section 4.3: Do you view these sections to be in conflict?
  - Section 6.3 states that Customer Notification should take place at the earliest opportunity, unless such disclosure would pose a risk to operational sensitivity; safety of individuals; or is prohibited by law or court order. Such circumstances must be detailed in the disclosure request.
  - Text of 6.3 was included in PSWG’s initial proposal.
  - Section 4.3 (in summary, also included in PSWG initial proposal) states that the provider will notify the customer of a disclosure request in accordance with its terms of service and the timeframe identified by LEA. The provider may voluntarily set a generic timeframe for this notice, such as 90 days, which can be extended at LEA’s request.
IRT feedback on draft Monthly Reporting Specification, distributed earlier this week (also attached)
IRT feedback on updated draft Applicant Guide (attached). Please note that the proposed application process has been substantially updated since the IRT’s last review of this document, and that the proposed fee schedule has been updated.

Please review these items prior to our meeting and come prepared to discuss each of these topics.

Amy E. Bivins

Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104