I also send my apologies.

Many thanks

Lindsay

Ditto

Theo

Me too

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 8, 2018, at 8:07 PM, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> wrote:

My apologies, but I've had a conflict arise for Tuesday.

 

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

 

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org> wrote:

Dear Colleagues,

 

In advance of our meeting on Tuesday, I’m including a few background points that may have been forgotten or lost since it’s been awhile since we have discussed the upcoming PPAA sections we expect to cover during the meeting. Reviewing the IRT’s feedback on the substance of the draft contract, we will likely be able to make it through the rest of the PPAA draft (not including the specifications) next week.

 

With respect to the feedback received on PPAA Section 3.12 (abuse contact):Per discussion on IRT calls in early 2017, we began drafting this section with RAA requirements where Final Report was silent (final report mentioned "designated" rather than "dedicated" contact but was otherwise silent on specific abuse contact requirements. The IRT supported this approach at the time. We adapted RAA requirements, per IRT discussions and Final Report, to allow for abuse contact options other than an email address (per recommendation in final report--"to address increasing volumes of spam" associated with the publication of an abuse contact email address (see p. 62 of Final Report).

 

Re: PSWG feedback--this "abuse contact" provision governs when other frameworks (LEA or IP) do not apply

 

IRT feedback re: Section 3.12.2 is noted—I believe the edits were added in an attempt to capture the requirements of the LEA framework, but this can be handled within the framework itself.

 

Section 3.14: This edit was proposed based on text from Final Report in the IP framework—this was discussed briefly on a prior IRT call but can be discussed further.

 

Section 3.17: IRT feedback was that this does not read consistently with Final Report. IRT members who raised this point are asked to explain why/how they believe this is inconstant with the Final Report, as our interpretation of this text is that it has the same meaning as the Final Report.

 

Section 3.19: This requirement was included in the Final Report.

 

Please provide any further feedback on these or any other aspects of the PPAA and issues identified in the issues list on the list prior to our call next week.

 

Best,

Amy

 

Amy E. Bivins

Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager

Registrar Services and Industry Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551

Fax:  +1 (202) 789-0104

Email: amy.bivins@icann.org

www.icann.org[icann.org]

 

_______________________________________________
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

 

_______________________________________________
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl

_______________________________________________

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list

Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl