Thanks Chris for your feedback. As a reminder the nature of ICANN staff role during the IRT phase greatly differs from the Working Group phase. ICANN has taken the concerns of IRT members into consideration. If you are seeking additional materials, I kindly as you to be very specific in the information you are seeking.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Gore
From: Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Chris Pelling <chris@netearth.net>
Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 at 3:07 PM
To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org>, gtheo <gtheo@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] [Ext] Re: PP fees proposal document attached
Hi Amy,
Its astounding that icann org have literally taken no notice of the concerns the IRT have about the representation of the fee structure.
Is it no wonder half of us no longer bother to interact with giving feedback as icann simply do as they please anyway?
If took months for icann to "back up" their fee structure and what was provided was simply third grade material.
Sent by Chris on the move.
-------- Original message --------
From: Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org>
Date: 13/06/2018 19:12 (GMT+01:00)
To: gtheo <gtheo@xs4all.nl>, gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] [Ext] Re: PP fees proposal document attached
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you for taking the time to review and provide feedback on the privacy and proxy service provider accreditation fees-related documentation, both on the list and during the meetings we have recently had on this topic.
ICANN org has carefully considered the feedback of all IRT members in developing the proposed fee structure. Despite recommendations from some IRT members to reduce the proposed fees, ICANN org continues to believe that the fees proposed are reasonable and appropriate, for the reasons identified in the fees proposal documentation (attached).
As noted in the fees proposal, ICANN org analyzed three relevant factors in reaching the fee structure that was proposed: relevant benchmarks; fees transparency, simplicity, stability and predictability; and anticipated program management costs. ICANN org understands that some IRT members disagree with this assessment, but did not find any of the arguments or suggestions raised by IRT members persuasive.
If persuasive reasons are raised for revisiting the proposed fee structure during the public comment period, ICANN org commits to revisit the proposed fees. Please know that ICANN org sincerely appreciates the time and effort you committed to this exercise and the broader work of the IRT.
Best,
Amy
-----Original Message-----
From: gtheo [mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2018 10:04 AM
To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
Cc: Amy Bivins <amy.bivins@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] PP fees proposal document attached
Thanks Amy,
Am I reading this correctly? The program startup and application processing is going to cost; 1,117,390???
That is a huge amount of money for a program startup if only a few providers signup for this and the majority decides that the temporary spec or it's successor is enough privacy for registrants. But maybe I am reading it incorrectly.
When I look at the Activity Relevant Department(s) Accredited Provider Account Management Services, it seems many of these activities already exist for Registrars. Can those activities not be handled by the same folks?
I mean does it matter if a Registrar changes its name or a Privacy Provider? It's the same type of processing is it not?
Also, a question about the PP Data Retention Waiver activity. What is this activity?
Thanks,
Theo
Amy Bivins schreef op 2018-05-22 10:20 PM:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Attached, you will find additional information related to the proposed
> fees for the privacy and proxy service provider accreditation program.
> Please review and send any comments/questions to the list.
>
> Thank you for your patience.
>
> Best,
>
> Amy
>
> AMY E. BIVINS
>
> Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager
>
> Registrar Services and Industry Relations
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551
>
> Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104
>
> Email: amy.bivins@icann.org
>
> www.icann.org [1]
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=Dw
> ICAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=uerz4ckt1v4Qhbv-T
> plkjKTey9bgtdWrvLyZDu0mXuk&m=BJtpG8Olp_3NAmSVAsUTW_HmMsKblc3_3k59uUScn
> vs&s=YBcBo-2U5vstASdpDcav-4W8w712XbFjerD180TrPRo&e=
> _______________________________________________
> Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
> Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl
_______________________________________________
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list
Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl