Dear IRT, Thank you for completing IRT Task 20250123. For ease of tracking, I’ll address both of your comments here. * Roger, you are correct. We do not yet have alignment on whether the Illustrative Disclosure Framework is just an “illustrative“ example. This is addressed in TQ.C<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvVfgLtnqzcSarbL2UfeHQV_CykUbpv-DB_m5ZAg...>. The focus of TQ.D, on the other hand, related to unclear objectives for IP requests. Clarifying objectives can be found in Annex B<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1nS5WTk0p79XRT...> of the final report and do not appear to need GNSO guidance. * Volker, your point on TQ.I is already covered within TQ.A and we have further noted your concerns within the IRT input section for additional context for GNSO consideration. Please let us know if you have further comments to close out this task. Thank you for your continued support. Kind Regards, The IPT From: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Reply-To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 3:54 PM To: "gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org" <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Cc: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org>, Volker Greimann <volker.greimann@centralnic.com> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Re: IRT Task 20250123: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: 3 Feb 2025 Dear Dennis, thank you for the summary. I would propose we expand a bit on the third bullet TQ:I as it is not just GDPR that has changed the landscape but also changes to the contracts and new ICANN policies that had an effect on the applicability of the original recommendations. Unless, of course, this is already included in TQ:A in which case I withdraw my proposal. Sincerely, Volker Greimann General Counsel & Head of Policy and Compliance - Online Division volker.greimann@centralnic.com Office: +49-172-6367025 Web: www.teaminternet.com Team Internet Group PLC (AIM:TIG). Registered Office: 4th Floor, Saddlers House, 44 Gutter Lane, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 6BR. Team Internet is a company registered in England and Wales with the company number 8576358. ________________________________ From: Dennis Chang via Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Sent: 24 January 2025 12:26 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Cc: Dennis Chang <dennis.chang@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Task 20250123: Review Progress of Candidate Threshold Questions. Due: 3 Feb 2025 Dear IRT, Thank you all for your time and feedback on draft responses to threshold questions. With three sessions remaining in our work plan on the 3 threshold questions [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1jvVfgLtnqzcSa...> we would like to address the remaining candidate questions that are shown in the IRT Threshold Question tracker.. Please review our proposed assessment and handling of the following candidate threshold questions, as found in the IRT Threshold Question Tracker [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rqfRaG1yL...>. Please reply to this message on the list if you have any objections by Monday, 3 Feb 2025. * TQ.D: (Unclear objectives around Illustrative Disclosure Framework for IP requests). GNSO Guidance may not be needed as clarification of the objectives for framework are in Annex B [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1nS5WTk0p79XRT...> of final report. * TQ.G: (Conflict with Transfer Policy Recommendations). This does not appear to be a threshold question, but is a coordination concern and would be useful to consider for further discussion during implementation. This has been a noted topic in implementation tracker for reference. * TQ.I: (GDPR Changing the landscape) This focus of this candidate threshold question appears to be duplicative of content already included in the drafting of TQ.A: Definitions & Industry use. * TQ.J: (Higher risk of inadvertent publication of a customer’s details in the course of de-accreditation for unaffiliated providers?) Threshold Question appears to fall into clarifying questions and has been discussed in the industry practices session during ICANN81. We are making steady progress and intend to focus our discussions in the upcoming session on Threshold Question 3 relating to disclosure frameworks. -- Kind Regards, Dennis S. Chang GDD Programs Director Phone: +1 213 293 7889 Skype: dennisSchang www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org> One World – One Internet