Dear Colleagues, Please note that references to “April” in the subject line and note below should be “May.” Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org www.icann.org From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2017 9:39 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT poll deadline extended to 3 April; 2 April IRT meeting canceled Hi Darcy and all, Yes, certainly. Everyone, please complete this survey no later than your end of day next Wednesday, April 3. Thank you for your participation and contribution. So far, we have 9 responses that show a clear preference among IRT members to use “option 1” as a starting point in designing the de-accreditation process. Also, next week’s IRT meeting, scheduled for 2 May, will be canceled because we do not have new materials prepared to discuss. I regret that this will result in cancellations two weeks in a row (our meeting on 9 May is canceled due to the GDD Summit), but the break will allow time to ensure we have materials ready to discuss at our next meeting, scheduled for 16 May. Calendar updates will be distributed separately. I apologize for any inconvenience. When we re-convene in mid-May, we expect to be discussing the PSWG proposal, as soon as the PSWG is able to distribute it to the IRT. We will also discuss proposals on accreditation criteria/processes and de-accreditation following the initial IRT discussions, and we expect that we will be able to begin discussing the accreditation agreement shortly, as well. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Darcy Southwell Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 3:24 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Thanks, Theo. I appreciate your suggestion and agree with you about adding option #3 and #4 to the survey. @Amy, I think it would be helpful if you could give us more than 3 days to complete the survey. Can we leave this open for at least a week? Darcy From: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of gtheo <gtheo@xs4all.nl <mailto:gtheo@xs4all.nl> > Reply-To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Date: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 12:49 PM To: <gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] IRT Member Poll Re: De-Accreditation: Please Complete by EOD 28 April Hi Amy, I am struggling a little with this poll in the sense of committing to it. The mentioned principles recommended by the WG are fine. But the two possible options that ICANN sees as solutions are by no means complete. I appreciate the speediness of staff, but we are talking bout registrants here and procedures and how that will affect them. Option 1 looks like a path forward but requires a lot of work in the sense of getting it right. Option 2 looks not practical, as this procedure applies to registrars and not privacy providers. Making this work will also require a lot of work. Option 3? Work on option 1 and use it as a starting point and develop a framework and map out the actors and the possible scenarios. We will run into a lot of practical issues here, like for example is a 30 days notice enough and how are bounces being dealt with? This looks simple, but it will get complex fast. Option 4, other solutions? Thanks, Theo Amy Bivins schreef op 2017-04-25 06:16 PM: Dear Colleagues, Pursuant to our discussion on the Privacy/Proxy IRT call today, please complete the following one-question survey NO LATER THAN YOUR END OF DAY FRIDAY, 28 APRIL, 2017, https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/3D8F2B5 The introduction to the survey includes the background that was provided on the call. I encourage those who could not attend to also listen to the recording before answering the survey. The recording and other meeting materials are available on the wiki, https://community.icann.org/display/IRT/25+April+2017. Thank you for your participation on the call today and also on this poll. We need all of you to participate to ensure we have a clear view of your opinions on this topic. Details about next week's IRT meeting will be provided by the end of this week. Best, Amy AMY E. BIVINS Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl _______________________________________________ Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl mailing list Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl