Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59
Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Hi all, Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 <mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> swyld@hostopia.com hostopia.com Hostopia, a DeluxeR company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org>; Nick Shorey <lists@nickshorey.com> Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: <https://participate.icann.org/ppirt> https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
Hi Sarah, I'll answer, but also encourage others to weigh in. In short, the discussion on the calls was that the initial 24-hour period for reviewing all requests that come in was too short, which is why the change was suggested there. There did not seem to be any suggestion to change the action period for "high priority" requests following the initial review period (in this instance, the total time from receipt of request to a required action would be two business days + 24 hours). Hope this helps! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi all, Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 swyld@hostopia.com<mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> hostopia.com Hostopia, a Deluxe(r) company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org<mailto:fabien.betremieux@icann.org>>; Nick Shorey <lists@nickshorey.com<mailto:lists@nickshorey.com>> Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
Thanks Amy! I see now that the 24 hours is upon completion of the receipt process, had missed that. -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 <mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> swyld@hostopia.com hostopia.com Hostopia, a DeluxeR company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:31 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi Sarah, I'll answer, but also encourage others to weigh in. In short, the discussion on the calls was that the initial 24-hour period for reviewing all requests that come in was too short, which is why the change was suggested there. There did not seem to be any suggestion to change the action period for "high priority" requests following the initial review period (in this instance, the total time from receipt of request to a required action would be two business days + 24 hours). Hope this helps! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi all, Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 <mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> swyld@hostopia.com hostopia.com Hostopia, a DeluxeR company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org <mailto:fabien.betremieux@icann.org> >; Nick Shorey <lists@nickshorey.com <mailto:lists@nickshorey.com> > Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org <mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: <https://participate.icann.org/ppirt> https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org <mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org>
+1 From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:31 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi Sarah, I'll answer, but also encourage others to weigh in. In short, the discussion on the calls was that the initial 24-hour period for reviewing all requests that come in was too short, which is why the change was suggested there. There did not seem to be any suggestion to change the action period for "high priority" requests following the initial review period (in this instance, the total time from receipt of request to a required action would be two business days + 24 hours). Hope this helps! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi all, Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 swyld@hostopia.com<mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> hostopia.com Hostopia, a Deluxe(r) company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org<mailto:fabien.betremieux@icann.org>>; Nick Shorey <lists@nickshorey.com<mailto:lists@nickshorey.com>> Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
+1 From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Roger D Carney Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:16 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 +1 From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 9:31 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi Sarah, I'll answer, but also encourage others to weigh in. In short, the discussion on the calls was that the initial 24-hour period for reviewing all requests that come in was too short, which is why the change was suggested there. There did not seem to be any suggestion to change the action period for "high priority" requests following the initial review period (in this instance, the total time from receipt of request to a required action would be two business days + 24 hours). Hope this helps! Amy From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarah Wyld Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:27 AM To: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Hi all, Just a question - I notice that in 3.2.1 we've changed the review timeframe from 24 hours to two business days, but then down in 4.1.2 it's 24 hours to action a High Priority request. Were we OK with this because it's High Priority? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld | Product Manager 5915 Airport Rd | Mississauga, ON L4V1T1 p 905.673.7575 | x6832 swyld@hostopia.com<mailto:swyld@hostopia.com> hostopia.com Hostopia, a Deluxe(r) company. Behind the brands that power small business.SM NOTE: The information contained in this electronic message may be confidential information and is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any use, distribution, transmission or forwarding of information contained in this e-mail by persons who are not intended recipients may be a violation of law and is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. From: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Amy Bivins Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 8:59 AM To: Fabien Betremieux <fabien.betremieux@icann.org<mailto:fabien.betremieux@icann.org>>; Nick Shorey <lists@nickshorey.com<mailto:lists@nickshorey.com>> Cc: gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org<mailto:gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl@icann.org> Subject: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Discussion document, proposed agenda for PP IRT/PSWG meeting at ICANN59 Nick and Fabien, Attached, you will find a markup of the PSWG's LEA disclosure framework proposal, including items that the IRT wishes to discuss during the face-to-face in J'burg. The most substantive topics are in Sections 1.4, 1.5, 3.1 and 3.2.1. Given the very short 45-minute meeting time, I'd suggest that discussion start on those points so that time isn't lost during the F2F on some of the more minor suggested edits. As you know, I am not traveling to ICANN59, but I will be dialed in. Jennifer Gore is going to be the staff facilitator, as logistics may make it difficult to facilitate remotely. Proposed Agenda * Intro (Jennifer Gore) * IRT overview of proposed discussion topics (IRT members Roger Carney and Eric Rokobauer have offered to lead) * IRT/PSWG discussion * Next steps-Plan for IRT/PSWG refinement of draft framework as materials are prepared for public comment Meeting Details * Tuesday, 27 June, 1415-1500 local time * Location: Boardroom 3 (Note-this is a very small room that seats approximately 24 people. Seating preference will be given to IRT and PSWG members and staff facilitator) * Remote participation link: https://participate.icann.org/ppirt * Phone bridge information will be distributed in separate meeting invite. We look forward to what we hope will be a productive discussion and thank you and your team for your help in securing meeting space and logistics on-site. If you have questions or suggestions in the interim, please don't hesitate to contact me. Best, Amy E. Bivins Registrar Services and Engagement Senior Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins@icann.org<mailto:amy.bivins@icann.org> www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
participants (4)
-
Amy Bivins -
DiBiase, Gregory -
Roger D Carney -
Sarah Wyld