Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team meeting which has been scheduled for Thursday 21 October at 13.00 UTC. As a reminder, please review the background briefings and provide your input on the remaining questions for discussion by COB today (18 October):

• Background briefing assignment #2: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LvqM6KlNGyTVQxe_l5v03-UWlsxo4AAl/edit [docs.google.com]
• Background briefing assignment #3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1S-bBG75O6VsGg4mhGgIsKKoUK7lDMO-w/edit [docs.google.com]
• Background briefing assignment #4: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gvVN4IQjrkinQom0Xj_QGjTBTO-XkMri/edit [docs.google.com]

Also, please don’t forget to add your proposed follow up questions for ICANN org to the following document:

• https://docs.google.com/document/d/1arlKdQkbRkE1LuurmDdd-PZP184_AdFm/edit

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team – Meeting #3

Thursday 21 October at 13.00 UTC

1. Welcome & Chair Updates (10 minutes)
   1. Miscellaneous administrative issues
   2. ICANN72 session – Tuesday Tuesday 26 October (19.30 – 21.00 UTC).

Proposed agenda:

• Welcome & Introduction
• High level overview of workplan
• Open microphone
• Confirm action items & next meeting (Thursday 4 November at 13.00 UTC)

2. Background briefing assignment #2 – see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OyzzAjZgvNkfZ5EekUvJ7PQg80vNZvJ3/edit
   1. Review assignment #2
   2. Consider questions and team input received:

• What information, if any, is missing to support the team’s deliberations on whether ARS needs a revamp or whether there are other ways in which accuracy levels can/should be measured?
• What approach should the team take to develop these recommendations?
• How much time and resources are expected to be needed to either revamp ARS or implement other ways in which accuracy levels can/should be measured?

3. Confirm next steps

3. Background briefing assignment #3 – see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NiwMk6qHOQRn7VdcW0Paj5OoC3tWAQpm/edit
   1. Review assignment #3
   2. Consider questions and team input received:

• What is necessary to undertake such an analysis?
• What is the definition of “effective”?
• How are “accurate and reliable” to be interpreted (see also assignment #1 re. working definitions)?

3. What next steps and approach should the team take to address this assignment?
4. Confirm next steps

4. Background briefing assignment #4 - see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Z8t-uH4gRqXytHOGnIkZ2qMSJctgR_kD/edit
   1. Review assignment #4
   2. Consider questions and team input received:

• When & how are estimates of benefits and costs expected to be developed?
• In addition to outcome of assignment #1-3 and cost/benefit analysis, is there anything further that is needed for the scoping team to deliberate on whether any changes are needed to improve accuracy levels? 
• Based on response to previous question, what are the options the team can consider for how and by whom these changes would need to be developed?

3. What next steps and approach should the team take to address this assignment?
4. Confirm next steps

5. Confirm action items & next meeting (ICANN72 session on Tuesday 26 October at 19.30 UTC)