Hello All,

So here are the administrative items I raised last week and which I wanted to set forth in more detail as promised.  If there are no objections on these points today, I would like to have our ICANN Org colleagues move forward with helping us implement these action items.

• I would like to utilize the use of Alternate members similar to the practice used during the EPDP phases to help distribute the workload and to hopefully prevent burn out. I heard no objections last week, but want to raise the issue again and confirm consensus before asking the various stakeholder groups to designate their alternative members. If we move forward with this recommendation I would ask the various stakeholder groups to prioritize those individuals from under represented ICANN regions: South America, Africa and Asia/Pacific.

• I would like to propose the use of a dedicated and moderated email address to solicit information from third parties that may not be a member of one of the existing stakeholder groups. All email would go to a separate public archived list, and ICANN Org would then share any relevant contributions to the main Accuracy Scoping mailing list.  ICANN is currently using a similar public email address in connection with the SSAD, see https://www.icann.org/ssadodp  Finally, since there is no anticipated public comment period with our work, the use of this email will further maximize the ability for the community to contribute. If there are no objections, ICANN Org will take the necessary steps to set up this email and included it on the current Accuracy Scoping wikipage.

Best regards,

Michael