Thank you, Sarah. In response to your questions, from a staff support team perspective: * Yes – following the review of the gap analysis proposals we’ll either integrate the write up for that part in the google doc or share it as a standalone document so that the Scoping Team can review and make sure it aligns with the team’s discussion. * In relation to your second question, when you refer to ‘gap analysis method selection’ are you referring to the ‘gap analysis proposals’? If that is what you are referring to, we would expect that the Scoping Team would make recommendations to the Council concerning which proposals it would suggest proceeding with, if any. This is also in line with assignment #2 (“The Scoping Team is expected to provide recommendations for how accuracy levels can be determined and measured, including, but not limited to, whether the WHOIS ARS needs a revamp to make it fit for purpose or whether there are other ways in which accuracy levels can/should be measured.") The Council will then need to consider these recommendations, as well as potential resources that would need to be requested to carry out these recommendations and decide how to proceed. See also the related action item below: “RDA Scoping Team to opine, particularly, on the proposals that do not require access to personal data; specifically, could the proposals that do not require personal data move forward, or is there another way that meaningful progress can be made while EDPB outreach is ongoing?” Best regards, Marika From: GNSO-Accuracy-ST <gnso-accuracy-st-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> Date: Wednesday, 11 May 2022 at 15:55 To: "gnso-accuracy-st@icann.org" <gnso-accuracy-st@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-Accuracy-ST] Proposed Agenda - Registration Data AccuracyScoping Team meeting #29 on Thursday 12 May at 14.00 UTC Hello Scoping Team, The CPH reps have now input our comments into the Report for Assignments 1 & 2. We note that there remain placeholders for both the EDPB input and also the gap analysis brainstorming which resulted in several options for how to assess whether current accuracy requirements are achieved. Will the Scoping Team be able to review an updated version of the report after the yellow-highlighted sections are updated? Finally, we want to confirm if our understanding that the gap analysis method selection and completion will be conducted by the GNSO Council is correct. If not, how and by whom will that decision be made and work be done? Thanks, -- Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com> [cid:image001.png@01D86554.5DB71F10] From: Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Sent: May 11, 2022 3:01 AM To: gnso-accuracy-st@icann.org<mailto:gnso-accuracy-st@icann.org> Subject: [GNSO-Accuracy-ST] Proposed Agenda - Registration Data AccuracyScoping Team meeting #29 on Thursday 12 May at 14.00 UTC Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for the next Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 12 May at 14.00 UTC. As a reminder: 1. RDA Scoping Team Members to review the Write-Up for Assignments 1 and 2 in its entirety and add proposed edits (using the comment function only) no later than 14:00 UTC on Wednesday, 11 May.https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4yvFNAYwQVql7DQob60vX/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4y...> 2. RDA Scoping Team to opine, particularly, on the proposals that do not require access to personal data; specifically, could the proposals that do not require personal data move forward, or is there another way that meaningful progress can be made while EDPB outreach is ongoing? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4yvFNAYwQVql7DQob60vX/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4y...>) 3. RDA Scoping Team to review responses from ICANN Compliance and determine if any follow-up questions are needed: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/2022-April/000398.html. Best regards, Caitlin, Berry and Marika Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team – Meeting #29 Thursday 12 May at 14.00 UTC 1. Welcome & Chair Updates (5 minutes) * Project Change Request submitted to the GNSO Council (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2022-May/025662.html) * ICANN74 session scheduled for Tuesday 14 June from 11.15 – 12.30 UTC (13.15 – 14.30 local time) 2. Gap Analysis Data Collection Proposals that do not involve access to registration data (30 minutes) (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4yvFNAYwQVql7DQob60vX/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/1sScP8MwgDCg4y...>) a. Proposal D - Registrar Audit * Opportunity to discuss further with ICANN Compliance * Proposal A - Registrar Survey * Proposal E – Review of Accuracy Complaints d. Confirm next steps 3. Scenarios for EDPB * See update from ICANN org (https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/2022-May/000444.html) * Scoping Team feedback by 23 May * Confirm next steps 1. Write up for assignments #1 & #2 (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/13sP-2z7rusEYrDyntrgm-tcIavPMJndU/edit [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/docs.google.com/document/d/13sP-2z7rusEYr...>) (15 minutes) * Review input received * Consider possible recommendations * Confirm next steps 1. ICANN org responses to recent set of questions (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-accuracy-st/2022-April/000398.html) (If follow up questions are identified prior to the meeting) * Reactions / follow up questions * Confirm next steps 1. Confirm action items & next meeting (Thursday 19 May at 14.00 UTC)