Hi Team: 

Here is a start on the documentation for our report. For our discussion later today and during the next week. 

Welp, our work took somewhat of a negative turn after the first set of interviews. 

What was, when talking about registrations data: "Board rejection and the subsequent, constructive back and forth discussion with the community is a sign of a healthy organisation,” became, when talking about SubPro: "he Board approach, in particular with the obsessive need to have absolute discretion to make final decisions over everything, ... erodes the Multi-stakeholder Model.”

I think the new docs probably reflect that turn.  

There are three docs: 
  1. The Findings notes, which are interview statements attributed to the interviewee: not for publication, but for our reference. The added material is in red font.
  2. A new Findings doc. For publication.  The added material is in red font. What’d I miss or mischaracterise?
  3. A redline Recommendations doc - the redline being the change from last time to this. You can see I have provided explanation or rationale to readers can (try to) make sense of our recommendations. 
  4. A clean version of the same Recommendations doc. Plenty to discuss here. 

Usually, I would review this work several more times before releasing it. So, sorry. 

Team and staff: Please do not share with co-workers.

Talk to you soon.

Kurt