Actions & Notes: GNSO Drafting Team Meeting 27 February 21:00 UTC
Dear all, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the GNSO Drafting Team meeting held on 27 February 2019 (21:00-22:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102146169. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ACTIONS & NOTES: Action Items: 1. The GNSO Secretariat to schedule a meeting on 27 March 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 2. Draft Guidelines and Templates for Sections 4.2 Community Independent Review Process (IRP) and 4.3 Independent Review Process (IRP): * Staff to keep the Google document open until David McAuley has a chance to add his comments (at least 48 hours). * Staff to develop a final draft for discussion on 27 March. 3. Staff to develop a draft estimated timeline for completion of the guidelines/templates. 4. Staff to begin development of guidelines/templates for Section 18.12 Special IANA Naming Function Reviews (IFRs) 5. Staff to determine if there are other possible actions by the Council that could prevent the GNSO from taking its actions as a Decisional Participant of the Empowered Community (such as blocking a motion circulated with less than required advance notice) [ONGOING] Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided. 2. Review and Discuss Draft of Guidelines/Templates for Sections 4.2 and 4.3. See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D127ORbHLRk8FeD9j2W-b8_4wKlkaPW-mK33H01l... General Comments: -- Good first draft. -- Technical comments: nomenclature of sections and articles -- need for some precision (as to parts of the Bylaws). Example: suggest using "RIP Claimant" as from "Reconsidration Requestor". -- Leave the Google document open for more comments. -- Edits relating to whether it's "GNSO Council" or "GNSO". The GNSO Operating Procedures are Council specific. The Bylaws refer to the "GNSO" but the GNSO Operating Procedures refer to the GNSO Council. -- Want to avoid any kind of confusion -- they are the "GNSO Operating Procedures", not "GNSO Council Operating Procedures". Specific comments: Page 8, Changes to Reconsideration Request form, but this is an ICANN Org form, so not sure we can suggest changes to it. We can pass on the suggested changes as an FYI. Page 11, In the motion, is it appropriate for staff to send the Reconsideration Request form. Should it be from the EC Representative? Or the GNSO Council? Instead say, "Council leadership on behalf of the appointed GNSO Rep to the Empowered Community Administration shall send". Page 6, Reconsideration Request form: Page 10, 4.2 Motion Template – under resolved clause 3, add "timely/immediately" 4. Next steps/next meeting: -- Schedule next meeting on 27 March. -- Staff to complete the final draft prior to 27 March. -- DT to Work on Section 18.12 Special IFRs -- Draft for 27 March. -- Staff to draft an estimated timeline for completing the work.
Dear all, having been absent for a while due to email issues I read the last transscript on GIP discussion. Interesting to see that GIP comes potentiallly to life - similar as the EPDP after several years of a sleeping beauty. I'm with you that we can make use at least of parts of it. Julie, could you share the google-docs link? I couldn't get through so far. Best regareds Wolf-Ulrich Am 27.02.2019 um 23:43 schrieb Julie Hedlund:
Dear all,
Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from theGNSO Drafting Team meeting held on27 February 2019(21:00-22:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. */Please note that thesearehigh-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript/*/./ The recording, AC chat,transcriptand attendance records are posted on the wikiat:https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102146169.
Best Regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
*ACTIONS & NOTES:*
*Action Items:*
1. The GNSO Secretariat to schedule a meeting on 27 March 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 2. Draft Guidelines and Templates for Sections 4.2 Community Independent Review Process (IRP) and 4.3Independent Review Process (IRP): 1. Staff to keep the Google document open until David McAuley has a chance to add his comments (at least 48 hours). 2. Staff to develop a final draft for discussion on 27 March. 3. Staff to develop a draft estimated timeline for completion of the guidelines/templates. 4. Staff to begin development of guidelines/templates for Section 18.12 Special IANA Naming Function Reviews (IFRs) 5. Staff to determine if there are other possible actions by the Council that could prevent the GNSO from taking its actions as a Decisional Participant of the Empowered Community (such as blocking a motion circulated with less than required advance notice) [ONGOING]
*Notes:*
1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.
2. Review and Discuss Draft of Guidelines/Templates for Sections 4.2 and 4.3. See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D127ORbHLRk8FeD9j2W-b8_4wKlkaPW-mK33H01l...
_General Comments_:
-- Good first draft.
-- Technical comments: nomenclature of sections and articles -- need for some precision (as to parts of the Bylaws). Example: suggest using "RIP Claimant" as from "Reconsidration Requestor".
-- Leave the Google document open for more comments.
-- Edits relating to whether it's "GNSO Council" or "GNSO". The GNSO Operating Procedures are Council specific. The Bylaws refer to the "GNSO" but the GNSO Operating Procedures refer to the GNSO Council.
-- Want to avoid any kind of confusion -- they are the "GNSO Operating Procedures", not "GNSO Council Operating Procedures".
_Specific comments_:
Page 8, Changes to Reconsideration Request form, but this is an ICANN Org form, so not sure we can suggest changes to it. We can pass on the suggested changes as an FYI.
Page 11, In the motion, is it appropriate for staff to send the Reconsideration Request form. Should it be from the EC Representative? Or the GNSO Council? Instead say, "Council leadership on behalf of the appointed GNSO Rep to the Empowered Community Administration shall send".
Page 6, Reconsideration Request form:
Page 10, 4.2 Motion Template – under resolved clause 3, add "timely/immediately"
4. Next steps/next meeting:
-- Schedule next meeting on 27 March.
-- Staff to complete the final draft prior to 27 March.
-- DT to Work on Section 18.12 Special IFRs -- Draft for 27 March.
-- Staff to draft an estimated timeline for completing the work.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt
Dear Wolf-Ulrich, Here’s the action item below with the link. Kind regards, Julie Per action item 3 below from the meeting on 10 April: Section 18.12 Special IFRs – GNSO Input Process: Staff to put text of GNSO Input Procedure into a Google document for DT members to edit as possible Special IFR procedures/guidelines Staff has created a Google Document for you to edit at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_y4Qm2TdV2g2JthY4PvXRTEFn6Froz5Jw-fxemUj... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>. The action is for DT members to edit or comment on the text of the GNSO Input Process as guidelines for how the process could be customized for the GNSO in deciding whether to request the initiation of a Special IRF in consultation with the ccNSO. The edits and comments will be discussed at the next meeting. From: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de> Date: Sunday, April 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org" <gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Actions & Notes: GNSO Drafting Team Meeting 27 February 21:00 UTC Dear all, having been absent for a while due to email issues I read the last transscript on GIP discussion. Interesting to see that GIP comes potentiallly to life - similar as the EPDP after several years of a sleeping beauty. I'm with you that we can make use at least of parts of it. Julie, could you share the google-docs link? I couldn't get through so far. Best regareds Wolf-Ulrich Am 27.02.2019 um 23:43 schrieb Julie Hedlund: Dear all, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the GNSO Drafting Team meeting held on 27 February 2019 (21:00-22:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=102146169. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ACTIONS & NOTES: Action Items: 1. The GNSO Secretariat to schedule a meeting on 27 March 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 2. Draft Guidelines and Templates for Sections 4.2 Community Independent Review Process (IRP) and 4.3 Independent Review Process (IRP): * Staff to keep the Google document open until David McAuley has a chance to add his comments (at least 48 hours). * Staff to develop a final draft for discussion on 27 March. 1. Staff to develop a draft estimated timeline for completion of the guidelines/templates. 2. Staff to begin development of guidelines/templates for Section 18.12 Special IANA Naming Function Reviews (IFRs) 3. Staff to determine if there are other possible actions by the Council that could prevent the GNSO from taking its actions as a Decisional Participant of the Empowered Community (such as blocking a motion circulated with less than required advance notice) [ONGOING] Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided. 2. Review and Discuss Draft of Guidelines/Templates for Sections 4.2 and 4.3. See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D127ORbHLRk8FeD9j2W-b8_4wKlkaPW-mK33H01l... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> General Comments: -- Good first draft. -- Technical comments: nomenclature of sections and articles -- need for some precision (as to parts of the Bylaws). Example: suggest using "RIP Claimant" as from "Reconsidration Requestor". -- Leave the Google document open for more comments. -- Edits relating to whether it's "GNSO Council" or "GNSO". The GNSO Operating Procedures are Council specific. The Bylaws refer to the "GNSO" but the GNSO Operating Procedures refer to the GNSO Council. -- Want to avoid any kind of confusion -- they are the "GNSO Operating Procedures", not "GNSO Council Operating Procedures". Specific comments: Page 8, Changes to Reconsideration Request form, but this is an ICANN Org form, so not sure we can suggest changes to it. We can pass on the suggested changes as an FYI. Page 11, In the motion, is it appropriate for staff to send the Reconsideration Request form. Should it be from the EC Representative? Or the GNSO Council? Instead say, "Council leadership on behalf of the appointed GNSO Rep to the Empowered Community Administration shall send". Page 6, Reconsideration Request form: Page 10, 4.2 Motion Template – under resolved clause 3, add "timely/immediately" 4. Next steps/next meeting: -- Schedule next meeting on 27 March. -- Staff to complete the final draft prior to 27 March. -- DT to Work on Section 18.12 Special IFRs -- Draft for 27 March. -- Staff to draft an estimated timeline for completing the work. _______________________________________________ Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt
participants (2)
-
Julie Hedlund -
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben