Dear DT members, Per action item 4 below from the actions from the meeting on 15 May, please review the revised GUIDELINES & MOTION TEMPLATES: SECTION 2.2 PETITION PROCESS FOR SPECIFIED ACTIONS & SECTION 2.3 REJECTION ACTION COMMUNITY FORUM DRAFT 17 May 2019 at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uBKPYQs0gzrqtU7NPenT2mkDXTAfBBW4grCwudfa... The guidelines were revised to make them consistent with the ccNSO guidelines, while ensuring that they reflect GNSO processes and procedures. This document will be on the agenda for the next meeting on Wednesday, 29 May. In the meantime, DT members are encouraged to make suggested edits and comments in the Google document. Thank you very much for your consideration. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Gnso-bylaws-dt <gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Thursday, May 16, 2019 at 4:43 PM To: "gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org" <gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Actions & Notes: GNSO Drafting Team Meeting 15 May 21:00 UTC Dear all, Please see below the action items and notes captured by staff from the GNSO Drafting Team meeting held on 15 May 2019 (21:00-22:00 UTC). Staff have posted to the wiki space the action items and notes. Please note that these are high-level notes and are not meant as a substitute for the recording, chat room, or transcript. The recording, AC chat, transcript and attendance records are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=108332293. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director ACTIONS & NOTES: Actions: 1. Timeline: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review. 2. Section 18.12 Special IFRs: David McAuley will redraft Section 4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes 3. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review. 4. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review. Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates. 2. Timeline: ACTION: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review. 3. Section 18.12 Special IFRs: a. Guidelines for How to Use the GNSO Input Process for a Special IFR 4.1 Introduction -- “Must select a decision process and document its deliberations and decisions. Council [may use the GIP to determine]...” -- keep it simple. -- Or could say, “should consider”. 4.3 and 4.4: -- Resolve Wolf-Ulrich’s comment -- don’t make the change. This reflects the order of the GIP. 4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes -- Question: Section 4.5 GIP will be seeking input from SOs/ACs, but it’s not clear if this has happened or will be in conjunction with ccNSO. -- Interpret as ccNSO and GNSO doing it together and it would have been completed. -- There is also the issue of public comment. It is confusing in this document. -- Need to note the time for consultation with SOs/ACs and public comment. -- Flag for redrafting. See suggested language in the text by Steve DelBianco. ACTION: David McAuley agreed to review and redraft. b. ccNSO/GNSO guidelines -- staff is drafting, inquiry into ICANN Legal on initiation of a Special IFR -- Maxim’s concerns about what is the “consultation”? -- Make it clear in the guidelines what the outcome is with the discussion with Legal. 4. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review. 5. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.