Fwd: [Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt] **Reminder** Meeting invitation: GNSO Drafting Team call / Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC
Reminder to all that we have our extra call this week (in roughly 9 hours). Our sole focus in this extra call is to reach a decision on how/to whom to submit a petition to remove a director. We need to interpret Bylaws Annex D in the GNSO context. I have read this again carefully and reviewed the recordings from our previous calls. Here is my interpretation as a strawman for our call: The language of Annex D section 3.1 ((a) "Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant...") tells me that the key terms are "*individual*" and "*Decisional Participant*". As I understand our previous calls, we all agree (in this contexts and elsewhere in our work) that "individual" means anyone. The term is not defined in the Bylaws. Then in Annex D section 3.1 (b), ("During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition..."), this tells me that the clock starts when the *Decisional Participant* receives the petition. Article 6, section 6.1 defines "Decisional Participant": (a) The Empowered Community ("*EC*") shall be a nonprofit association formed under the laws of the State of California consisting of the ASO, the ccNSO (as defined in *Section 10.1*), the GNSO (as defined in *Section 11.1*), the ALAC (as defined in *Section 12.2(d)(i)*) and the GAC (each a "*Decisional Participant*" or "associate," and collectively, the "*Decisional Participants*"). Annex D, Section 3.1(b) therefore can be read: "During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition), this tells us that the clock starts when the *GNSO* receives the petition." Section 11.2 of the Bylaws describes the GNSO as "consist[ing] of" "[a] Number of Constituencies"... "organized within the Stakeholder Groups". I do not understand 11.2 to allow us to interpret any single constituency or Stakeholder Group individually as the GNSO. Rather, the GNSO consists of all of those. Back to Annex D, Section 3.1(b), my view is that "when the *GNSO* receives the petition" means the GNSO as a whole, not any individual SG or C. For matters of the EC, the GNSO Council acts for the GNSO as a whole. Hence the clock starts ticking when the GNSO Council receives the petition. If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C. I have copied the relevant Annex D section 3.1(a) and (b) below. For ease, link to the full Bylaws here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#annexD Very best wishes, and thank you for your continued hard work, Heather ARTICLE 3 PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF EC'S RIGHTS TO REMOVE DIRECTORS AND RECALL THE BOARD *Section 3.1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR REMOVAL PROCESS* (a) Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant seeking to remove a Director holding Seats 1 through 8 and initiate the Nominating Committee Director Removal Process ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition*"). Each Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition shall set forth the rationale upon which such individual seeks to remove such Director. The process set forth in this *Section 3.1* of *Annex D* is referred to herein as the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Process*." (b) During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition (such date of receipt, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date*") and ending at 11:59 p.m. (as calculated by local time at the location of ICANN's principal office) on the date that is the 21st day after the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date (as it relates to a particular Director, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Period*"), the Decisional Participant that has received a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal* *Petitioned Decisional Participant*") shall either accept or reject such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition; provided that a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant shall not accept a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition if, during the same term, the Director who is the subject of such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition had previously been subject to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition that led to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Community Forum (as discussed in *Section 3.1(e)* of this *Annex D* ). On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 PM Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee call on *Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.*
14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Friday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: *https://tinyurl.com/yyj4po7l [tinyurl.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_yyj4po7l&d=...> *
Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/JpECBw
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/my/gnso.pdp2 [icann.zoom.us] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_gnso.p...>
You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in.
*Slides to assist you with Zoom:*
*Welcome to Zoom*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf [icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*Zoom FAQ*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf [icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*If Zoom disappears, see instructions: *https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappea... [gnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_de...>
A calendar invitation has equally been sent and an ical (if your inbox doesn’t receive direct calendar invitations) is available here as attachment for you to download to your calendar.
*If you are joining via audio only, please see below.*
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,5091335294# US (San Jose)
+19294362866,,5091335294# US (New York)
Meeting ID: 509 133 5294
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abQBVd1jHM <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_abQBVd1jHM&d=...>
If you require a dial-out or to send apologies please send an email request with your preferred contact number to gnso-secs@icann.org
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julie
_______________________________________________ Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Apologies, all - I found a seriously nonsensical typo in my earlier message! Trying again with the correction below. Sorry for slamming your inbox. H Reminder to all that we have our extra call this week (in roughly 9 hours). Our sole focus in this extra call is to reach a decision on how/to whom to submit a petition to remove a director. We need to interpret Bylaws Annex D in the GNSO context. I have read this again carefully and reviewed the recordings from our previous calls. Here is my interpretation as a strawman for our call: The language of Annex D section 3.1 ((a) "Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant...") tells me that the key terms are "*individual*" and "*Decisional Participant*". As I understand our previous calls, we all agree (in this contexts and elsewhere in our work) that "individual" means anyone. The term is not defined in the Bylaws. Then in Annex D section 3.1 (b), ("During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition..."), this tells me that the clock starts when the *Decisional Participant* receives the petition. Article 6, section 6.1 defines "Decisional Participant": (a) The Empowered Community ("*EC*") shall be a nonprofit association formed under the laws of the State of California consisting of the ASO, the ccNSO (as defined in *Section 10.1*), the GNSO (as defined in *Section 11.1*), the ALAC (as defined in *Section 12.2(d)(i)*) and the GAC (each a "*Decisional Participant*" or "associate," and collectively, the "*Decisional Participants*"). Annex D, Section 3.1(b) therefore can be read: "During the period beginning on the date that the *GNSO* received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition...." Section 11.2 of the Bylaws describes the *GNSO* as "consist[ing] of" "[a] Number of Constituencies"... "organized within the Stakeholder Groups". I do not understand 11.2 to allow us to interpret any single constituency or Stakeholder Group individually as the GNSO. Rather, the GNSO consists of all of those. Back to Annex D, Section 3.1(b), my view is that "when the *GNSO* receives the petition" means the GNSO as a whole, not any individual SG or C. For matters of the EC, the GNSO Council acts for the GNSO as a whole. Hence the clock starts ticking when the GNSO Council receives the petition. If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C. I have copied the relevant Annex D section 3.1(a) and (b) below. For ease, link to the full Bylaws here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#annexD Very best wishes, and thank you for your continued hard work, Heather ARTICLE 3 PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF EC'S RIGHTS TO REMOVE DIRECTORS AND RECALL THE BOARD *Section 3.1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR REMOVAL PROCESS* (a) Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant seeking to remove a Director holding Seats 1 through 8 and initiate the Nominating Committee Director Removal Process ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition*"). Each Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition shall set forth the rationale upon which such individual seeks to remove such Director. The process set forth in this *Section 3.1* of *Annex D* is referred to herein as the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Process*." (b) During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition (such date of receipt, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date*") and ending at 11:59 p.m. (as calculated by local time at the location of ICANN's principal office) on the date that is the 21st day after the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date (as it relates to a particular Director, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Period*"), the Decisional Participant that has received a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal* *Petitioned Decisional Participant*") shall either accept or reject such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition; provided that a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant shall not accept a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition if, during the same term, the Director who is the subject of such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition had previously been subject to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition that led to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Community Forum (as discussed in *Section 3.1(e)* of this *Annex D* ). On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 PM Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee call on *Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.*
14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Friday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: *https://tinyurl.com/yyj4po7l [tinyurl.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_yyj4po7l&d=...> *
Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/JpECBw
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/my/gnso.pdp2 [icann.zoom.us] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_gnso.p...>
You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in.
*Slides to assist you with Zoom:*
*Welcome to Zoom*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf [icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*Zoom FAQ*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf [icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*If Zoom disappears, see instructions: *https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappea... [gnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_de...>
A calendar invitation has equally been sent and an ical (if your inbox doesn’t receive direct calendar invitations) is available here as attachment for you to download to your calendar.
*If you are joining via audio only, please see below.*
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,5091335294# US (San Jose)
+19294362866,,5091335294# US (New York)
Meeting ID: 509 133 5294
Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abQBVd1jHM <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_abQBVd1jHM&d=...>
If you require a dial-out or to send apologies please send an email request with your preferred contact number to gnso-secs@icann.org
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julie
_______________________________________________ Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thank you, Heather. I agree with your analysis – that is how I have been interpreting these parts of Annex D. And so I agree with this part of your email: If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C. The only point I would add is this. If the individual submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council on the individual’s own initiative, then I agree with the foregoing. If, however, the GNSO adopts a policy, guideline, process – whatever – that requires or urges an individual to submit a petition not directly to the GNSO but rather through an SG or C then will the submission to the SG or C at the GNSO’s direction/urging not start the clock? I would think that it would. David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 From: Gnso-bylaws-dt <gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Heather Forrest Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:11 AM To: gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org; Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>; Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Fwd: [Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt] **Reminder** Meeting invitation: GNSO Drafting Team call / Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC Apologies, all - I found a seriously nonsensical typo in my earlier message! Trying again with the correction below. Sorry for slamming your inbox. H Reminder to all that we have our extra call this week (in roughly 9 hours). Our sole focus in this extra call is to reach a decision on how/to whom to submit a petition to remove a director. We need to interpret Bylaws Annex D in the GNSO context. I have read this again carefully and reviewed the recordings from our previous calls. Here is my interpretation as a strawman for our call: The language of Annex D section 3.1 ((a) "Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant...") tells me that the key terms are "individual" and "Decisional Participant". As I understand our previous calls, we all agree (in this contexts and elsewhere in our work) that "individual" means anyone. The term is not defined in the Bylaws. Then in Annex D section 3.1 (b), ("During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition..."), this tells me that the clock starts when the Decisional Participant receives the petition. Article 6, section 6.1 defines "Decisional Participant": (a) The Empowered Community ("EC") shall be a nonprofit association formed under the laws of the State of California consisting of the ASO, the ccNSO (as defined in Section 10.1), the GNSO (as defined in Section 11.1), the ALAC (as defined in Section 12.2(d)(i)) and the GAC (each a "Decisional Participant" or "associate," and collectively, the "Decisional Participants"). Annex D, Section 3.1(b) therefore can be read: "During the period beginning on the date that the GNSO received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition...." Section 11.2 of the Bylaws describes the GNSO as "consist[ing] of" "[a] Number of Constituencies"... "organized within the Stakeholder Groups". I do not understand 11.2 to allow us to interpret any single constituency or Stakeholder Group individually as the GNSO. Rather, the GNSO consists of all of those. Back to Annex D, Section 3.1(b), my view is that "when the GNSO receives the petition" means the GNSO as a whole, not any individual SG or C. For matters of the EC, the GNSO Council acts for the GNSO as a whole. Hence the clock starts ticking when the GNSO Council receives the petition. If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C. I have copied the relevant Annex D section 3.1(a) and (b) below. For ease, link to the full Bylaws here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#annexD Very best wishes, and thank you for your continued hard work, Heather ARTICLE 3 PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF EC'S RIGHTS TO REMOVE DIRECTORS AND RECALL THE BOARD Section 3.1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR REMOVAL PROCESS (a) Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant seeking to remove a Director holding Seats 1 through 8 and initiate the Nominating Committee Director Removal Process ("Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition"). Each Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition shall set forth the rationale upon which such individual seeks to remove such Director. The process set forth in this Section 3.1 of Annex D is referred to herein as the "Nominating Committee Director Removal Process." (b) During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition (such date of receipt, the "Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date") and ending at 11:59 p.m. (as calculated by local time at the location of ICANN's principal office) on the date that is the 21st day after the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date (as it relates to a particular Director, the "Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Period"), the Decisional Participant that has received a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition ("Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant") shall either accept or reject such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition; provided that a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant shall not accept a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition if, during the same term, the Director who is the subject of such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition had previously been subject to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition that led to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Community Forum (as discussed in Section 3.1(e) of this Annex D). On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 PM Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org<mailto:julie.bisland@icann.org>> wrote: Dear All, Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee call on Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Friday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yyj4po7l [tinyurl.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_yyj4po7l&d=...> Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/JpECBw Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/my/gnso.pdp2 [icann.zoom.us]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_gnso.p...> You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in. Slides to assist you with Zoom: Welcome to Zoom: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf [icann.box.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...> Zoom FAQ: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf [icann.box.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...> If Zoom disappears, see instructions: https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappea... [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_de...> A calendar invitation has equally been sent and an ical (if your inbox doesn’t receive direct calendar invitations) is available here as attachment for you to download to your calendar. If you are joining via audio only, please see below. One tap mobile +16699006833,,5091335294# US (San Jose) +19294362866,,5091335294# US (New York) Meeting ID: 509 133 5294 Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/abQBVd1jHM<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_abQBVd1jHM&d=DwMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DRa2dXAvSFpCIgmkXhFzL7ar9Qfqa0AIgn-H4xR2EBk&m=6DjNZSxGb11znFjNW2R6mHN1S2xg1UuHTmgDZkB3ElM&s=p9fFKGGXcPJLImgJkmq4Ki2hkie8Q8dwkZBC1wr8bls&e=> If you require a dial-out or to send apologies please send an email request with your preferred contact number to gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> Thank you. Kind regards, Julie _______________________________________________ Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org<mailto:Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi David, on the one hand I understand your point of starting the clock to put pressure on SG/Cs. I'd prefer to not allow such a policy rather than taking the direct line to the DP, meaning GNSO council (secretariat?). Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Am 26.09.2019 um 15:09 schrieb McAuley, David via Gnso-bylaws-dt:
Thank you, Heather.
I agree with your analysis – that is how I have been interpreting these parts of Annex D.
And so I agree with this part of your email:
If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C.
The only point I would add is this. If the individual submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council on the individual’s own initiative, then I agree with the foregoing.
If, however, the GNSO adopts a policy, guideline, process – whatever – that requires or urges an individual to submit a petition not directly to the GNSO but rather through an SG or C then will the submission to the SG or C at the GNSO’s direction/urging not start the clock? I would think that it would.
David
David McAuley
Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager
Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154
*From:* Gnso-bylaws-dt <gnso-bylaws-dt-bounces@icann.org> *On Behalf Of *Heather Forrest *Sent:* Thursday, September 26, 2019 8:11 AM *To:* gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org; Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>; Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] [Gnso-bylaws-dt] Fwd: [Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt] **Reminder** Meeting invitation: GNSO Drafting Team call / Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC
Apologies, all - I found a seriously nonsensical typo in my earlier message! Trying again with the correction below. Sorry for slamming your inbox.
H
Reminder to all that we have our extra call this week (in roughly 9 hours).
Our sole focus in this extra call is to reach a decision on how/to whom to submit a petition to remove a director. We need to interpret Bylaws Annex D in the GNSO context. I have read this again carefully and reviewed the recordings from our previous calls. Here is my interpretation as a strawman for our call:
The language of Annex D section 3.1 ((a) "Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant...") tells me that the key terms are "*individual*" and "*Decisional Participant*". As I understand our previous calls, we all agree (in this contexts and elsewhere in our work) that "individual" means anyone. The term is not defined in the Bylaws.
Then in Annex D section 3.1 (b), ("During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition..."), this tells me that the clock starts when the *Decisional Participant* receives the petition.
Article 6, section 6.1 defines "Decisional Participant": (a) The Empowered Community ("*EC*") shall be a nonprofit association formed under the laws of the State of California consisting of the ASO, the ccNSO (as defined in _Section 10.1_), the GNSO (as defined in _Section 11.1_), the ALAC (as defined in _Section 12.2(d)(i)_) and the GAC (each a "*Decisional Participant*" or "associate," and collectively, the "*Decisional Participants*").
Annex D, Section 3.1(b) therefore can be read: "During the period beginning on the date that the *GNSO* received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition...." Section 11.2 of the Bylaws describes the *GNSO* as "consist[ing] of" "[a] Number of Constituencies"... "organized within the Stakeholder Groups". I do not understand 11.2 to allow us to interpret any single constituency or Stakeholder Group individually as the GNSO. Rather, the GNSO consists of all of those. Back to Annex D, Section 3.1(b), my view is that "when the *GNSO* receives the petition" means the GNSO as a whole, not any individual SG or C. For matters of the EC, the GNSO Council acts for the GNSO as a whole. Hence the clock starts ticking when the GNSO Council receives the petition.
If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C.
I have copied the relevant Annex D section 3.1(a) and (b) below. For ease, link to the full Bylaws here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#annexD
Very best wishes, and thank you for your continued hard work,
Heather
ARTICLE 3 PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF EC'S RIGHTS TO REMOVE DIRECTORS AND RECALL THE BOARD
*Section 3.1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR REMOVAL PROCESS*
(a) Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant seeking to remove a Director holding Seats 1 through 8 and initiate the Nominating Committee Director Removal Process ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition*"). Each Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition shall set forth the rationale upon which such individual seeks to remove such Director. The process set forth in this _Section 3.1_ of _Annex D_ is referred to herein as the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Process*."
(b) During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition (such date of receipt, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date*") and ending at 11:59 p.m. (as calculated by local time at the location of ICANN's principal office) on the date that is the 21st day after the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date (as it relates to a particular Director, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Period*"), the Decisional Participant that has received a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal* *Petitioned Decisional Participant*") shall either accept or reject such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition; provided that a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant shall not accept a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition if, during the same term, the Director who is the subject of such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition had previously been subject to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition that led to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Community Forum (as discussed in _Section 3.1(e)_ of this _Annex D_).
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 PM Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org <mailto:julie.bisland@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee**call on *Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.*
14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Friday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: *https://tinyurl.com/yyj4po7l [tinyurl.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_yyj4po7l&d=...> *
Agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/JpECBw
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/my/gnso.pdp2[icann.zoom.us] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_gnso.p...>
You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in.
*Slides to assist you with Zoom:*
*Welcome to Zoom*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf[icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
**
*Zoom FAQ*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf[icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*If Zoom disappears, see instructions: *https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappea... [gnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_de...>
A calendar invitation has equally been sent and an ical (if your inbox doesn’t receive direct calendar invitations) is available here as attachment for you to download to your calendar.
*If you are joining via audio only, please see below.*
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,5091335294# US (San Jose)
+19294362866,,5091335294# US (New York)
Meeting ID: 509 133 5294
Find your local number:https://zoom.us/u/abQBVd1jHM <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_abQBVd1jHM&d=...>
If you require a dial-out or to send apologies please send an email request with your preferred contact number to gnso-secs@icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julie
_______________________________________________ Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org <mailto:Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Heather, I like your interpretation and am in full support. BTW this again shows me that lawyers and techies are often following a similar logic in procedural matters ;-). To bring the interpretation of Annex D section 3.1 (a) to perfection we should be clear about the origin of the "individual". Is here a "GNSO-relationship" requested? Or could any individual with or without any DP-related affiliation submit a petition to any of the DPs? The latter may open the individual searching for the most likely "removal-friendly" DP. Looking forward to the discussion later today. Wolf-Ulrich Am 26.09.2019 um 14:07 schrieb Heather Forrest:
Reminder to all that we have our extra call this week (in roughly 9 hours).
Our sole focus in this extra call is to reach a decision on how/to whom to submit a petition to remove a director. We need to interpret Bylaws Annex D in the GNSO context. I have read this again carefully and reviewed the recordings from our previous calls. Here is my interpretation as a strawman for our call:
The language of Annex D section 3.1 ((a) "Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant...") tells me that the key terms are "*individual*" and "*Decisional Participant*". As I understand our previous calls, we all agree (in this contexts and elsewhere in our work) that "individual" means anyone. The term is not defined in the Bylaws.
Then in Annex D section 3.1 (b), ("During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition..."), this tells me that the clock starts when the *Decisional Participant* receives the petition.
Article 6, section 6.1 defines "Decisional Participant": (a) The Empowered Community ("*EC*") shall be a nonprofit association formed under the laws of the State of California consisting of the ASO, the ccNSO (as defined in _Section 10.1_), the GNSO (as defined in _Section 11.1_), the ALAC (as defined in _Section 12.2(d)(i)_) and the GAC (each a "*Decisional Participant*" or "associate," and collectively, the "*Decisional Participants*").
Annex D, Section 3.1(b) therefore can be read: "During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition), this tells us that the clock starts when the *GNSO* receives the petition." Section 11.2 of the Bylaws describes the GNSO as "consist[ing] of" "[a] Number of Constituencies"... "organized within the Stakeholder Groups". I do not understand 11.2 to allow us to interpret any single constituency or Stakeholder Group individually as the GNSO. Rather, the GNSO consists of all of those. Back to Annex D, Section 3.1(b), my view is that "when the *GNSO* receives the petition" means the GNSO as a whole, not any individual SG or C. For matters of the EC, the GNSO Council acts for the GNSO as a whole. Hence the clock starts ticking when the GNSO Council receives the petition.
If the "individual" in Annex D section 3.1(a) submits the petition to something other than the GNSO Council, the clock has not yet started. That's not to say that an individual is prevented from submitting to an SG/C, but it seems to me that the SG/C is obliged to send on to the Council ASAP, without debate or discussion. Annex D doesn't give us any ground to enable an SG or C to delay or discuss, and further, "individual" means the petitioner, not an SG or C.
I have copied the relevant Annex D section 3.1(a) and (b) below. For ease, link to the full Bylaws here: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/bylaws-en/#annexD
Very best wishes, and thank you for your continued hard work,
Heather
ARTICLE 3 PROCEDURE FOR EXERCISE OF EC'S RIGHTS TO REMOVE DIRECTORS AND RECALL THE BOARD
*Section 3.1. NOMINATING COMMITTEE DIRECTOR REMOVAL PROCESS*
(a) Subject to the procedures and requirements developed by the applicable Decisional Participant, an individual may submit a petition to a Decisional Participant seeking to remove a Director holding Seats 1 through 8 and initiate the Nominating Committee Director Removal Process ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition*"). Each Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition shall set forth the rationale upon which such individual seeks to remove such Director. The process set forth in this _Section 3.1_ of _Annex D_ is referred to herein as the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Process*."
(b) During the period beginning on the date that the Decisional Participant received the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition (such date of receipt, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date*") and ending at 11:59 p.m. (as calculated by local time at the location of ICANN's principal office) on the date that is the 21st day after the Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Date (as it relates to a particular Director, the "*Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition Period*"), the Decisional Participant that has received a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition ("*Nominating Committee Director Removal* *Petitioned Decisional Participant*") shall either accept or reject such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition; provided that a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petitioned Decisional Participant shall not accept a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition if, during the same term, the Director who is the subject of such Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition had previously been subject to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Petition that led to a Nominating Committee Director Removal Community Forum (as discussed in _Section 3.1(e)_ of this _Annex D_).
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:47 PM Julie Bisland <julie.bisland@icann.org <mailto:julie.bisland@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Committee**call on*Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.*
14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Friday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Friday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Friday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: *https://tinyurl.com/yyj4po7l [tinyurl.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tinyurl.com_yyj4po7l&d=...> *
Agenda wiki page:https://community.icann.org/x/JpECBw
Zoom Room: https://icann.zoom.us/my/gnso.pdp2[icann.zoom.us] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.zoom.us_my_gnso.p...>
You will have VoIP and telecom bridge audio options available to you upon logging in.
*Slides to assist you with Zoom:*
*Welcome to Zoom*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/1sal3l5qf4csdukt0pk2c75ey3bte22z.pdf[icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
**
*Zoom FAQ*: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/d5rap0g6xphevhkdd3mhu2hy753l2m3s.pdf[icann.box.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__icann.box.com_shared_st...>
*If Zoom disappears, see instructions: *https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2019/presentation/disappea... [gnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_de...>
A calendar invitation has equally been sent and an ical (if your inbox doesn’t receive direct calendar invitations) is available here as attachment for you to download to your calendar.
*If you are joining via audio only, please see below.*
One tap mobile
+16699006833,,5091335294# US (San Jose)
+19294362866,,5091335294# US (New York)
Meeting ID: 509 133 5294
Find your local number:https://zoom.us/u/abQBVd1jHM <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__zoom.us_u_abQBVd1jHM&d=...>
If you require a dial-out or to send apologies please send an email request with your preferred contact number to gnso-secs@icann.org <mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Julie
_______________________________________________ Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org <mailto:Ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ntfy-gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-bylaws-dt mailing list Gnso-bylaws-dt@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-bylaws-dt _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (3)
-
Heather Forrest -
McAuley, David -
Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben