Dear CCOICI members,
Please find below the notes and action items from today’s CCOICI meeting. Please see the relevant materials which can be found on the wiki page:
https://community.icann.org/x/DRR1Cw.
Best regards,
Ariel, Julie and Marika
CCOICI Meeting #33
on Wednesday 21 December at 13.00 UTC
HOMEWORK/ACTION ITEMS: Staff to send the final draft of the Recommendations Report to the group for review.
Notes:
1. Welcome
2. Review the input in the Google doc at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ujjuS4APION0uSHz2dKnDZCj8JDbTjQK/edit [docs.google.com]:
a.
Suggestion |
Corresponding Comments |
An additional option is added to the question relating to Primary Organizational Affiliation, namely that in addition to “At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC)”, there is also the option to select “At-Large Community” |
a.
Suggestion |
Corresponding Comments |
Whether it should be possible for respondents who choose to, to have their name published in the summary report. |
Jeff Neuman (during
GNSO Council February meeting) |
Manju Chen |
a.
Agree
b.
disagree |
when there are a defined number of members in a WG, letting people choose to have their names published risks revealing the identities of those who don’t. |
Susan Payne |
a.
agree
b.
disagree |
b) I can see pros and cons of disclosing names, but I tend to agree with Manju’s comments above. Unwillingness to go on the record and/or concerns about retaliation may discourage frank feedback if the respondent is concerned about the
disclosure of their identity |
Discussion:
3. Review of the attached updated recommendations report:
Next Steps:
ACTION ITEM: Staff to send the final draft of the Recommendations Report to the group for review.
4. AOB: None.