Dear Chris,

Thanks for this. I did not intend to suggest we need to send another letter in such quick succession. I think including information in the wiki that clarifies that a future DNRD-DS is likely to support different languages or scripts may help clarify the matter, as it appears from some of the responses we have received that there may be some misunderstanding about what issues the WG is, and is not, addressing.

Cheers,
Peter




Peter J.Dernbach
譚璧德

  

Partner
合夥律師(外國法事務律師)

   T 886 (0)2 2311 2345 # 222
F 886 (0)2 2311 2688		   www.winklerpartners.com
pdernbach@winklerpartners.com

NOTICE: This email and any attachments contain private, confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient.
If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or distribute the contents and are requested to delete them and to notify the sender.

本電子郵件及其附件含有私有、機密、依法受特別保護之資料，僅供意定之收件人使用。若您並非所意定之收件人，即不得予以使用、重製或散布，並請刪除其內容，並通知寄件人。



On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:31 PM, Dillon, Chris <c.dillon@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear Peter,

 

This is just to pick up an issue you raised during yesterday’s call.

 

Our charter does mention a future DNRD-DS in different languages or scripts on p.3. However, this was not an aspect raised in the letters we sent to ACs and SOs.

 

As I mentioned I would prefer not to send a third letter to them in such quick succession. Fortunately, when I wrote to the ACs and SOs for the second time I did refer them to our wiki and so I could put a line there stressing that a future DNRD-DS is likely to support different languages or scripts.

 

Regards,

 

Chris.

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Centre for Digital Humanities, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599) ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon