Dear colleagues,

 

Julie’s drafting is difficult to improve.

However, I wonder if it would be good to have a line explicitly indicating that the PDP WG will be free to modify the five alternatives in Section II, effectively creating a sixth one which is recommended/preferred.

 

Beyond that my mind is starting to think about translation/transliteration principles for the representation of contact details (rather than notes for so many languages), but that is probably best left to the PDP WG. An example of a principle might be the answer to the question “What happens if there is more than one Romanization (transliteration) for a language in common use?”.

 

Looking forward to speaking later,

 

Regards,

 

Chris.

--

Research Associate in Linguistic Computing, Dept of Information Studies, UCL, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT Tel +44 20 7679 1599 (int 31599)ucl.ac.uk/dis/people/chrisdillon

 

From: owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org [mailto:owner-gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: 21 August 2013 20:05
To: gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-contactinfo-pdp-wg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Revised Draft PDP WG Charter
Importance: High

 

Dear members of the Charter Drafting Team,

 

This is a reminder that per our actions from our meeting that week, attached you will find a revised draft charter for your review and for discussion at our next meeting on Thursday, 22 August  1500 UTC (08:00 PDT, 11:00 EDT, 16:00 London, 17:00 CEST).  The changes are reflected as redlines.  This also is posted on wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/tatcipdp/22+August+2013. 

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Best regards,

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director