Thanks Julie,
  1. yes, please prepare a related email
  2. showing #8 is sufficient, together with the applicant’s name and professional as well as GNSO affiliation
  3. Will the ccNSO candidates’ and evaluation lists be available prior to the 24 July? If not, let’s cancel the call. If yes, let’s decide after we’ve seen it.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich

 
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Draft Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates
 

Dear CSC Selection Committee members,

 

I’ve attached the corrected motion. Wolf-Ulrich – Let me know if you would like me to prepare a brief email for you to send along with the motion to the GNSO Council.

 

Also attached are the summary data from the survey.  As you might imagine, for most responses it is not all that interesting, except for #8.  If you prefer, I can also send the individual responses.

 

We tentatively have a meeting scheduled on Sunday, 24 July at 2100 UTC to discuss the full slate of members and liaisons.  However, as you may have seen there now is a doodle poll to schedule two joint meetings of the ccNSO/GNSO CSC Selection Committees – the times would rotate between 02 August and 04 August to accommodate the wide range of time zones of the participants.  Please let me know if you would like to go ahead with the call of just your group on 24 July (it would not include the ccNSO).

 

Kind regards,

Julie

 

From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@t-online.de>
Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 3:24 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "gnso-csc@icann.org" <gnso-csc@icann.org>
Subject: Re: Draft Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates

 

Thanks Julie,

 

there’s one typo under Wheras 11 (submitted), no more change from my side.

 

Thanks to all for the evaluation and your thoughts re the survey and the lack of interest in the job shown. Besides the information provided through the survey I personally could get some knowledge of James and his understanding of IANA. I was on the CWG list where he was actively engaged, and I’m sure about he understande the material.

I was thinking about the reasons that just one candidate showed up. It’s not communications – a lot was done on various lists as well as in Helsinki. Maybe it’s the timing and time pressure. The very specialized character of the IANA tasks may also be a point hampering those who are not so familiar with. Time commitment was an issue I heard from someone who was principally interested.


Looking forward to the council meeting

Wolf-Ulrich

 

Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:16 AM

Subject: Draft Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison Candidates

 

Dear Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and CSC members,

 

Please see the attached draft amended motion based on the assumption that James Gannon is the only liaison candidate to be submitted to the GNSO Council.  I will be happy to make any changes you suggest.

 

Thanks so much for your assistance.

 

Kind regards,

Julie

 

Julie Hedlund, Policy Director