Dear
Heather,
The meeting at 12:30 today for
the CSC Selection Committee should have been canceled. Thank you so much
for checking.
Kind
regards,
Julie
From: Heather Forrest
<Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au>
Date: Thursday, June 30, 2016 at
10:57 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>,
"gnso-csc@icann.org" <gnso-csc@icann.org>
Subject: Re: For
Review: CSC Selection Committee Meeting 29 June
Julie,
all,
I'm very sorry not to
have been able to join you yesterday. I've caught up via the documents.
I have in my calendar a
meeting of our group today at 12:30 after Council - I'm guessing that's
incorrect, since it isn't mentioned in Julie's email below, but just want to
check.
Best
wishes,
Heather
From: gnso-csc-bounces@icann.org
<gnso-csc-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 1:17:06
AM
To: gnso-csc@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-csc] For Review:
CSC Selection Committee Meeting 29 June
Dear CSC
Selection Committee members,
Please see for
your review:
1.
Notes below from the
CSC Selection Committee meeting on 29 June at 15:15-16:45.
2.
Attached revised slides (in
PowerPoint and PDF) for the update to the GNSO Council during its meeting
tomorrow, 30 June, from 10:45 5o 12:30 local time. The agenda is available
here: https://community.icann.org/x/EQSOAw.
3.
Proposed evaluation
schedule:
a.
Deadline for GNSO Liaison EoIs is 15
July.
b.
Complete evaluation surveys for all
candidates 16-17 July, including draft ranking.
c.
Meet on Monday, 18 July to discuss
candidates and agree on ranking of the top 4 candidates.
d.
19 July: Submit 4 ranked candidates
and the full list of candidates to the GNSO Council for consideration at its
meeting on 21 July (with motion submitted per the deadline on 11
July).
Kind
regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy
Director
CSC Selection Committee
Meeting Notes, 29 June 2016
1. CSC Selection
Committee rules of working (conflicts of interest, consensus finding,
...):
?
Wolf-Ulrich offered, and was
accepted, to Chair/Moderate.
?
Conflicts of interest are not
an issue since no Selection Committee member plans to apply for the liaison
role.
?
Decision-making will be via
full consensus with no objections.
2. Discussion of
CSC candidate evaluation survey tool and the evaluation
process:
?
The criteria in the survey
tool, which is taken from the original Call for EoI (attached), will form the
basis of the evaluation.
?
Determined that there is no
need for Selection Committee members to recuse from the evaluation of candidates
from the same C/SG because:
o There are likely to be few
candidates;
o Evaluators from the same C/SG as a candidate may provide
useful knowledge and perspective.
?
If an interview of an
unfamiliar candidate is desired it might be arranged, but not likely to be
needed.
?
Support Staff will check EoIs
and request any missing information if necessary.
?
Support Staff will review the
survey tool and check to see if both conflicts of interest questions should be
mandatory (right now just the first is marked as such).
?
The skills evaluation will be
the primary criterion to prioritize candidates, but gender and geographic
diversity could be secondary criteria.
?
Each CSC Selection Committee
member may draft his or her own ranking that may be used to guide the discussion
of the final ranking among the full Committee.
3. Update on EOIs
received to date: 1 received thus far
4. Review of CSC
Selection Timeline – Comparison of ccNSO and GNSO Activities/Dates:
?
Determine why the ccNSO dates
are later than those originally proposed for the ccNSO/GNSO/RySG consultation,
although this may not be an issue.
?
Note that the ccNSO proposal
is that the selection of the full slate of liaisons and members would be made by
a joint Selection Committee of the ccNSO/GNSO/RySG. GNSO CSC Selection
Committee members noted that they may be willing to serve on that joint
selection committee.
5. Review of Update
Slides for GNSO Council Meeting:
?
Minor
edits.
?
Include Timeline of the
comparison of ccNSO and GNSO Activities/Dates.