Thanks Julie,
there’s one typo under Wheras 11 (submitted), no more change from my
side.
Thanks to all for the evaluation and your thoughts re the survey and the
lack of interest in the job shown. Besides the information provided through the
survey I personally could get some knowledge of James and his understanding of
IANA. I was on the CWG list where he was actively engaged, and I’m sure about he
understande the material.
I was thinking about the reasons that just one candidate showed up. It’s
not communications – a lot was done on various lists as well as in Helsinki.
Maybe it’s the timing and time pressure. The very specialized character of the
IANA tasks may also be a point hampering those who are not so familiar with.
Time commitment was an issue I heard from someone who was principally
interested.
Looking
forward to the council meeting
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 1:16 AM
Subject: Draft Amended Motion: GNSO CSC Liaison
Candidates
Dear Wolf-Ulrich Knoben and CSC
members,
Please see the attached draft
amended motion based on the assumption that James Gannon is the only liaison
candidate to be submitted to the GNSO Council. I will be happy to make any
changes you suggest.
Thanks so much for your
assistance.
Kind
regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy
Director