My sense is to measure success based on two binary questions: (1) did the WG use data and/or metrics as part of its process (e.g., in scoping/defining the issue, prioritizing the issues under consideration,
and/or guiding the WG to an informed recommendation on the issue under consideration), and (2) [was the incorporation of data and/or metrics] [or] [were the data/metrics] useful to the WG in its process?
Best,
Tony
Tony Onorato, Esq./CIPP(US)
FisherBroyles, LLP
Directs: 202.459.3599/646.397.4750
|
Fax: 516.706.9809
|
tony.onorato@fisherbroyles.com
| fisherbroyles.com
From: Berry Cobb [mailto:mail@berrycobb.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2015 3:33 PM
To: dmpm@icann.kavi.com; gnso-dmpm-wg@icann.org
Subject: [Dmpm] Metrics Request Pilot - DMPM Rec#1
All,
In making updates to the next version of our draft initial report, I reminded myself that we also need to include under the recommendation details some set of “measure of success.” I think it will benefit to provide at least a simple idea
of success for the community to respond to. Else, I suspect that if comments are not submitted to that regard, it will be asked by the GNSO Council.
Please provide input on the list, and I can add the groups ideas to the draft. I will include a placeholder in the document.
Thank you.
B
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
@berrycobb