Naoum,

this is a GREAT idea.

Perhaps we can refine it a little?

If any Registrar is currently doing or has the technical capacity of doing it, can they run the ADC on the Registered Names found to be abusive ie having attracted Mitigation? I.e. weed out the false positive reports. Such an exercise could provide insight into the actual size of the problem.

Reg,

are you currently in a position to assess or estimate abusive associated domain nanes for the numbers you showed, ie after removing false positive?

greetings, el

--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (retired)
el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply

On Apr 4, 2026 at 10:14 +0200, Naoum MENGOUDIS via Gnso-dnsabuse-pdp <gnso-dnsabuse-pdp@icann.org>, wrote:

Regarding those numbers, can we see how many of the phising reports that you acted upon turned out to be associated? i.e. the domains belonging to the same customer.

This way we could have an idea as to how much work the ADC would spare you (because you would not had received these additional reports if you actioned on all domains proactively).

thanks.

Naoum

[…]