I have been thinking a little more about this and done some (re)search:
ICANN sends on the order of 2,500–4,000 informal compliance notifications to contracted parties per year, of which about 15–20 escalate to formal breach notices (approximately half of which result in terminations).
I have had Claude draw a Bell Curve of 2800 items (Accredited Registrars) with the first three Standard Deviations marked (see the Attachment, if it survives the Mailing List).
On the 3rd SD there are 7. It's interesting that 3SD and Terminations are (roughly) the same.
Even though, admittedly, ADC is not included in the above, since the problem is large enough to have caused a PDP, one would expect to be able to plot false positives (and false negatives) on Bell Curves too, eventually.
Registrars underresponding are a fact of life already, and overreacting will happen too.
Negating this as a position by a Stakeholder Group strikes me as short sighted, negotiationwise.
el
On Jul 4, 2026 at 09:58 +0200, Eberhard W Lisse via Gnso-dnsabuse-pdp <gnso-dnsabuse-pdp@icann.org>, wrote:
All of this is hypothetical, so let's close the PDP down?
She offered details by the way.
I believe the NCSG has a case for walking away here.
el
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (retired)
el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply
Based on what? A few hypotheticals and one real one with no details?
Best regards,
Marc H. Trachtenberg
[…]
_______________________________________________
Gnso-dnsabuse-pdp mailing list -- gnso-dnsabuse-pdp@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-dnsabuse-pdp-leave@icann.org