Dear DNSAM PDP1, please see below the high-level notes and action items from todays call. The session recording can be found here: https://icann.zoom.us/recording/detail?meeting_id=T7r3Qf8yTNm0QjfqG5q2Lg%3D%... Our next meeting is scheduled for Monday, 13 April at 12:30 UTC. Kind regards, Feodora Action Items: * Staff to update straw person incorporating discussion on Q1 and 2 * WG to Review updated straw person and propose language adjustments toward convergence as well as rationale * WG to provide input on business models and potential impact/considerations e.g. Clarify direct vs. reseller models and any others to inform association criteria. Important Documents: * Collaboration Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GxM-Yrgv6sZPEYU8ikW4cRM5YqWsJuWGiQyO39pL... * WG wiki/ Session Slides: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/DAMP1/pages/935755777/2026... * Recording: https://icann.zoom.us/recording/detail?meeting_id=T7r3Qf8yTNm0QjfqG5q2Lg%3D%... High Level Notes: 1. Welcome (2 min) 2. Decision on WG Meeting Schedule & holidays (3 min) * Meeting schedule and holiday adjustments are “locked in”. Meetings to continue Mondays at 12:30 UTC. Some meeting conflicting w major holidays have been moved to Tuesday 12:30. Meeting invites have been updated. Please check your inbox. 1. Update on Workplan (5 min) · Work plan submitted to Council; expected to be discussed/acknowledged on 16 April. · Board liaisons confirmed: Jim Galvin, Chris Buckridge 4. Updates on CQ 1 (25 min) * Preliminary recommendation (strawperson): When a registrar has actionable evidence and has taken mitigation under 3.18.2, registrar must perform an associated domain check. * No convergence seems to exist on the following areas: · Disagreement on whether action must occur before conducting ADC. · Whether one abusive/malicious domain is sufficient trigger/threshold. · Some noted the risk of potentially low threshold, workload, and “guilt by association”. · Please see link to collaboration document for more details on proposed language: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GxM-Yrgv6sZPEYU8ikW4cRM5YqWsJuWGiQyO39pL... 5. Continue Deliberations to CQ 2 and CQ 3 (50 min) * Seems to be alignment on: · Association criteria should be flexible, non-prescriptive, and adaptable. · Avoid a fixed checklist, prefer examples/best practices. · Recognize variation across registrar models and evolving threat behaviour. · Further discussion needed on the relationship between “indicators” and contractual requirements? 6. AOB (5 min)