Dear All,

A gentle reminder for all of us to take a look at the links that Feodora circulated for us below. We aim to close out the discussion and conversations about report and motion (so we can make the Aug 4 cutoff for Council) so please do input your edits and comments so colleagues are able to take a look before our call scheduled for tomorrow.

Best,

Jen

From: Feodora Hamza via gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam <gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2025 10:22 AM
To: gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org
Subject: [gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam] Pending Action Item and Draft Documents

Dear DNS Abuse Small Team,

A kind reminder on the below updated documents and pending action item to review the draft motion and draft report. Please provide your comments directly into the documents by 30 July.

Draft Motion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QUEuJuxG9tyA0k-qKV_UR_FwDNnRsix2/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true

Updated Draft Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18AMsedMhKEox1196No0yS6ktqFbcTs2l/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true (main changes are highlighted in the document)

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards,

Feodora on behalf of the Support Team

From: Feodora Hamza <feodora.hamza@icann.org>
Date: Monday, 28 July 2025 at 16:25
To: "gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org" <gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org>
Subject: Pending Action Item: Draft Documents: 24 July 2025 Meeting Notes

Dear DNS Abuse Small Team,

A kind reminder on the below updates and pending action item. Please provide your comments directly into the documents prior by 30 July.

Draft Motion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QUEuJuxG9tyA0k-qKV_UR_FwDNnRsix2/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true

Updated Draft Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18AMsedMhKEox1196No0yS6ktqFbcTs2l/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true (main changes are highlighted in the document)

Kind regards,

Feodora

From: Feodora Hamza <feodora.hamza@icann.org>
Date: Friday, 25 July 2025 at 15:39
To: "gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org" <gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org>
Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>
Subject: Update: Draft Documents: 24 July 2025 Meeting Notes

Dear DNS Abuse Small Team,

In addition to below, please find the updated documents for your review prior to the next of the Small Team. Please provide your comments directly into the document by 30 July.

Draft Motion: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QUEuJuxG9tyA0k-qKV_UR_FwDNnRsix2/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true

Updated Draft Report: https://docs.google.com/document/d/18AMsedMhKEox1196No0yS6ktqFbcTs2l/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=115002119020327708482&rtpof=true&sd=true (main changes are highlighted in the document)

Kind regards,

Feodora on behalf of the support team

From: Steve Chan via gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam <gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org>
Reply to: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, 24 July 2025 at 19:10
To: "gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org" <gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam@icann.org>
Subject: [gnso-dnsabuse-smallteam] 24 July 2025 Meeting Notes

Dear DNS Abuse Small Team,

Please see below the meeting notes and action items from our 24 July meeting of the DNS Abuse Small Team.

Best,

Steve

Action Items:

Leadership and staff to propose a way to include the secondary priorities. This will likely include a table, an additional recommendation, and an explanatory paragraph about methodology.
Clarify the text in the report that the prioritized issues might not all warrant policy development.

Notes:

1. Welcome

Hopefully wrapping up on recommendations today.

2. Final Input on Gaps Matrix

Streamlined gap IDs and associated them to the Phases/Lifecycle Category. Kept, but hid the original gap IDs since the stakeholder comments sometimes referenced them.
Hopefully close the matrix today. Try and limit to “can’t live with” type concerns, if any.

3. Review Update Draft Report

Added recommendations 2 and 3, which suggest focusing on limited topics for the first PDP coming out of the Issue Report, as well as which topics to concentrate on.
What is the proper terminology in respect of “bulk registrations”? Settled on just referencing domain names.

3.a Main Gaps for Issue Report

The various groups have provided input about which gaps should be prioritized, generally as comments in draft report.
The NCSG’s priority is for a dispute resolution mechanism/access to remedy.
If there is a difference in opinion on the priorities, how should we reconcile? Specifically, how should the additional topics be captured (e.g., NCSG and CSG gaps).
What is currently included is where there seems to be convergence. Are the additional gaps points of convergence?
Validation seems more appropriate for Council level discussion.
Confirmation: the prioritized gaps will not result in the additional gaps being dropped.
Is it better to determine priority once the Issue Report is completed, since part of the Issue Report determines whether the gap is within ICANN’s remit and GNSO policy making?
The Council could change course on the prioritized topics once the Issue Report is delivered.
The prioritized topics facilitate staff’s ability prepare the draft charter.
Could parallel work continue on determining the prioritizing for future work? May result in resourcing issues. And probably should wait for the completion of the Issue Report. Could add a point in the small team’s report to note that this additional work could carry on.
Request for a visualization of the priorities of the various groups. May make sense to include as text. Options to consider include:

Add a recommendation 4 that includes topics for a subsequent PDP
And/or include a description of methodology for identifying the top three priorities.

No objections from NCSG to focus on 3 gaps identified.
Unclear whether DGA topic requires policy work. The Issue Report will likely uncover whether or not this is well suited for a PDP or perhaps another mechanism. The CPH has some text that helps justify why policy work might be warranted.

Action Item: Leadership and staff to propose a way to include the secondary priorities. This will likely include a table, an additional recommendation, and an explanatory paragraph about methodology.

Action Item: Clarify the text in the report that the prioritized issues might not all warrant policy development.

4. Review Draft Motion

The text might need to be adjusted (e.g., if there is another gap to include, or if the small team wants to identify that policy development might not be appropriate for all topics).
Question about Whereas 3, which references reaching out to GAC. Might be more accurate to reference the GAC Advice. Could also include mention of coordination through the GNSO’s liaison to the GAC.

5. AOB

FYI - GNSO support staff has reached out to SSAC support staff to provide an update on the small team and to note that the SSAC will have an opportunity to provide public comment on the Issue Report.

Steven Chan 

VP, Policy Development Support & GNSO Relations

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300

Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 

Email: steve.chan@icann.org

Skype: steve.chan55

Mobile: +1.310.339.4410

Find out more about the GNSO by visiting: https://learn.icann.org/

Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO

Transcripts and recordings of GNSO Working Group and Council events are located on the GNSO Master Calendar