Dear All,

Given that we have received a couple of requests for extending the time period to review the outcome language for A5 and A6, the EPDP leadership team agreed to extend the deadline till EOB Wednesday, 2 March. Thanks to Dennis who relayed information on RySG members’ review, and we look forward to receiving input from the ALAC, the GAC, and others in the EPDP Team.

Best,

Ariel

From: "Donna@registry.godaddy" <Donna@registry.godaddy>
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 7:28 PM
To: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: [Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Draft Outcome: Charter Questions A5 & A6

Hi All

Just to follow on from Ariel’s email: consideration and input on the language drafted for A5 and A6 by the represented groups of this EPDP Team is really important to our work.

Rather than rely on the assumption that no comment means agreement, I’d prefer to have each represented group actively confirm their agreement if that is indeed the case and if not, provide comments/input so that we can discuss areas of contention and find agreeable language for all to the extent possible.

Thanks

Donna

From: Gnso-epdp-idn-team <gnso-epdp-idn-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Ariel Liang
Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:22 AM
To: gnso-epdp-idn-team@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-idn-team] Draft Outcome: Charter Questions A5 & A6

Caution: This email is from an external sender. Please do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Forward suspicious emails to isitbad@.

Dear All,

Please find the draft outcome language for charter questions A5 and A6 on this google doc, pp.6-11: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Bt0LT45UaLynFNverh1nJhyvq6q6NxgSFAOnOp2LG44/edit?usp=sharing [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com] (it is also posted on the wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/XwyHCg [nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com]).

Following the agreed format, the draft outcome language includes the following components:

• Brief answer to the charter question
• Recommendations and implementation guidance  
• Rationale for recommendations and implementation guidance

We would like to highlight the following elements:

• Recommendation 1.5 under A5 (p.6): this proposed recommendation may be revisited after the EPDP Team tackles other charter questions; additional details may need to be fleshed out.
• Recommendation 1.6 under A6 (p.9): please pay particular attention to the proposed definition of “grandfathering” and provide input, if any.

Please provide any input/suggestion for the draft outcome language on the mailing list by Tuesday, 22 January. Any substantive comments will be discussed during the EPDP Team meeting in about two weeks.

Best Regards,

Steve, Emily, Ariel