Dear Chris

Thank you for the acknowledgement . 

In fact to be active remotely in a face

 to face process is difficult since once the 

gathering( small group )reached 

 some degree of preliminary agreement

 and brought that preliminary agreement 

to the main meeting , it would be not only 

difficult but inappropriate to object

 to such results even if the remote 

participant has full and valid reason for 

such late comments

However, thank you and thank the dear

 Team colleagues for that u deters ding

Best regards

Kavouss 

Sent from my iPhone

On 26 Sep 2018, at 07:49, Chris Disspain <chris.disspain@board.icann.org> wrote:

Kavouss,

I just want to acknowledge your willingness to be flexible and to accept with grace the challenges that you have faced as a remote participant. Thank you. 

Cheers,

CD

On 25 Sep 2018, at 18:43, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:

Dear David

Dear Gina

Dear rest of CBI

The establishment of small group was a wise decision and considerably facilitated and expedited the process of work without that it was not possible to converge on this very sensitive and complex issue

I listened the rest of the afternoon and did not intervened any more as the discussions and conduct of the meeting were continuing in the right and efficient direction in spite of various comments and counter comments which were normal in such circumstances

I hope that you would continue with the same manner  and lead the group to prepare the relevant part of the initial report.

By the way, please kindly understand the difficulties that I have had and will have to remotely participate in the live discussion

Regards

_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team