It will be a good discussion today, since we strongly disagree with this assessment. Or that one person gets to decide which use cases are valid.
Conflating BC-1 with LEA is a good example of a common misunderstanding, for example.
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:20 AM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC
Sanctions will be imposed on SSAC for violating the use case nonprofileration agreement – and being late, too!
More seriously, here is my take on the earlier use cases. I really think we only need to be discussing 4 or 5 of them, though I have not reviewed the late SSAC cases.
TM Continue
LEA1 OK to discuss
LEA2 OK to discuss
IPC-Copyright-Civil How is it different from TM case?
IPC-Copyright-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2
IPC-TM-Criminal Duplicates LEA1, LEA2
IPC-UDRP-URS-Due-Process OK to discuss
BC-1 Duplicates LEA1, LEA2
BC-2 ??
BC-3 Duplicates IPC-Copyright-Civil
BC-4 Unnecessary
BC-5 ??
BC-6 Out of mission
BC-7 Unnecessary
BC-8 Out of mission
BC-9 Unnecessary and out of mission
From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Ben Butler
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2019 12:31 AM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Gnso-edpd-team] Draft Use Cases from SSAC
Greetings ePDP team,
With apologies for the missed deadline, please find attached 3 use cases from SSAC for your review. As discussed in Marrakech, the hope is that these can help inform our future discussions on disclosure of non-public registration data
to security practitioners, reputation providers, and operational security teams.
We look forward to discussion of these and other use cases in the small teams and/or in plenary.
Thank You.
-Ben and Greg,
On behalf of SSAC ePDP support team