Dear All,
Per the action item from today’s meeting, please find attached the staff assessment and next steps report on the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling WHOIS Conflicts with Privacy Law which was published in
May 2017. As there were specific questions in relation to the origin of the procedure, I’ve excerpted the background section from this document below. As noted, the GNSO Council has already agreed to form an Implementation Advisory Group to review the procedure
and adopted a charter for this effort in February of this year (see
https://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201802). However, due to workload issues and the pending EPDP, the Council delayed the call for volunteers and agreed during its most recent meeting to decide when the call for volunteers should be launched
following the publication of the Initial Report on the Temporary Specification by the EPDP Team.
Best regards,
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
============================
Background (from
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/whois-privacy-conflicts-procedure-03may17-en.pdf).
In November 2005, the GNSO concluded
a policy development process (PDP) on Whois conflicts with privacy law which recommended that “In order to facilitate reconciliation of any conflicts between local/national mandatory privacy laws or regulations and applicable provisions of the ICANN contract
regarding the collection, display and distribution of personal data via the gTLD Whois service, ICANN should:
The ICANN Board of Directors adopted the recommendations in May 2006 and directed staff to develop such a Procedure. A draft Procedure was posted for public comment, and input was specifically solicited from
the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). The GAC recommended adding a provision, which was included as section 1.4 in the procedure, urging a registrar or registry to work with relevant national governments to ensure adherence to domestic and international
law, as well as applicable international conventions.
If the Whois requirements require changes that ICANN determines prevent compliance with contractual Whois obligations, ICANN may refrain, on a provisional basis, from taking enforcement action for non-compliance,
while ICANN prepares a public report and recommendation and submits it to the ICANN Board for a decision. Given that to date no registrar or registry operator has formally invoked the Whois Procedure, and yet numerous concerns have arisen from contracted parties
and the wider community, ICANN launched a review in 2014, as provided in the Whois Procedure’s final clause.
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email:
marika.konings@icann.org
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO
Newcomer pages.