Marika

Several participants in the EPDP have not taken the survey yet and you have closed the survey so we can’t add our responses. Please re-open. It is not a proper survey of rankings if it does not include all representative entities on the EPDP. I am sorry NCSG did not fill it out on time but we are distributed over multiple continents, and have to read 21 cases each with 5 or 6 pages, and then coordinate a response.

In general, I don’t think you should maintain the fiction that staff or chair can set an arbitrary deadline and then cut off all discussion when that deadline is not met. It is a violation of proper process.

I expect to see the survey reopened so that NCSG, GAC, ALAC can provide their input.

It also became clear to us that the rankings depend heavily on how we consolidate cases. In our view, there is a huge amount of overlap and duplication amongst the proposed cases. We should not be ranking and considering them until we know how they are going to be consolidated or grouped. And they will be consolidated, have not doubt about it; and if we discuss these cases before consolidating them we will be wasting massive amounts of time.

I suspect you think you are saving time by pushing these arbitrary cutoffs upon us but in fact you are not. By truncating discussions you are preventing us from coming to an agreement. This will just lead to additional contention.

Dr. Milton L Mueller

Georgia Institute of Technology

School of Public Policy

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2019 12:39 PM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Materials for agenda item #4

Dear EPDP Team,

In preparation for agenda item #4, please find attached the proposed order based on the responses received to the survey. Do note that this schedule is not carved in stone, but based on the speed of review, it will be adjusted as needed. As a reminder and discussed during the last meeting, the following approach will be followed:

· First reading of use case on one call (typically 30 min), followed by second/final reading on next call (typically 60 min);

· EPDP Team members to identify during the first reading which sections they have an issue and briefly describe its nature. After the call, member should submit edit/view/proposal in writing by Friday (COB). Staff support team to produce updated version based on inputs provided during first reading for the second reading and will disseminate the updated text by Tuesday;

· Aim of readings is to reach a broad understanding of all members on different aspects of the case rather than agreement on each word in the presented case.

Please take specific note of the following: “After the call, member should submit edit/view/proposal in writing by Friday (COB)” which will apply for the use case that will have its first reading during Thursday’s meeting.

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Date: Monday, July 15, 2019 at 08:32
To: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed agenda - EPDP Team meeting #9 on 18 July 2019

Dear EPDP Team,

Please find hereby the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 18 July at 14.00 UTC. As a reminder:

EPDP Team to review the updated LEA use case and provide feedback by Tuesday, 16 July.	16 July 2019
EPDP Team to respond to survey ranking use cases (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/YS597PR)	15 July 2019

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

=================

EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #9

Proposed Agenda

Thursday, 18 July 2019 at 14.00 UTC

1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (10 minutes)

· Update from Legal Committee

4. Use Cases Ranking Exercise (10 minutes)

· Overview of use cases submitted: https://community.icann.org/x/-KCjBg

· Confirm results of ranking exercise

· Confirm leadership proposed order and next steps

5. Use case – second reading: Investigation of criminal activity against a victim in the jurisdiction of the investigating EU LEA requesting data from a non-local data controller (30 minutes)

· Consider concerns / issues expressed on the mailing list prior to the meeting

· Preliminary agreement on use case

· Confirm next steps, if any

6. Use case – first reading: Investigation of criminal activity where domain names are used. Typical specific example: phishing attack (60 minutes)

· Introduction of use case (SSAC)

· Input from EPDP Team – questions, concerns, proposed modifications

· Confirm next steps

7. Any other business (5 minutes)

· Priority 2 small team meetings update

a) Accuracy and WHOIS ARS (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pS9Pibanj-Hp6LztZpeERtxdoLsnp4y_-do0vU5VJuw/edit)

b) Input received on other priority 2 items from RrSG (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2019-June/002174.html)

c) Leadership to recommend next steps via mailing list

· Council request for input on org letter requesting clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 (see https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/marby-to-drazek-21jun19-en.pdf). EPDP Team to provide input on the mailing list. Confirm deadline for input.

8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting on Thursday 25 July at 14.00 UTC (5 minutes)

· Confirm action items

· Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.