I thought this was the case too, Thomas. As best I recall, there was only one representative of the BC who objected to this proposal. But, perhaps I misheard.

Ayden Férdeline


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, February 20, 2019 12:43 PM, Thomas Rickert <epdp@gdpr.ninja> wrote:

Hello Marika,
I thought there was a lot of traction for Matt’s suggestion for a 30 day maximum response time. But then again, I had a bad connection and may not have caught all statements made correctly. 

Thanks,
Thomas 

Am 19.02.2019 um 18:20 schrieb Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>:

Dear EPDP Team,
 
As discussed during today’s meeting, please find attached the updates discussed and agreed to for recommendation #11 (city field) and #18 (reasonable access). Please share with the list as soon as possible if in your view these changes do not align with the agreements reached today.
 
Best regards,
 
Caitlin, Berry and Marika
 
Marika Konings
Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 
 
Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. 
 
<Updated recs 11 and 18 - 19 Feb 2019.docx>_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list