Hi all,

In the implementation guidance, under a), one organization is mentioned by name. While I agree with the sentiment here, I do not believe it is appropriate for us to name any organizations in our implementation guidance, as we have not ourselves done any due diligence to verify whether or not said organization is well placed to collaborate with an accreditation authority.

Many thanks,
Ayden Férdeline


‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, 7. October 2019 17:20, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:

Dear EPDP Team,

 

In line with the action item assigned to the staff support team, we’ve gone ahead and updated the accreditation building block (see https://drive.google.com/a/icann.org/file/d/1u6MI1HI3_0jxHul4GVTsWDIp8SiMm_5Z/view?usp=sharing). This updated version aims to reflect the deliberations to date as well as the different contributions provided. You will note that we’ve attempted to separate policy recommendations from implementation guidance in relation to this topic.

 

This building block is expected to be the main agenda item for Thursday’s meeting (10 October), so please make sure to review in advance of the call.

 

Best regards,

 

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

 

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org  

 

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.