Dear Alan, Thank you very much for the thoughts you have shared.

I am still of the view that Appendix C provide some brief guidelines and easy references and its total removal should debated .I do not see and inconsistancy between the content of this Appendix and the GDPR..It was argued that " ICANN and the Contracted Parties should address the subject matter of Appendix C via separate contractual negotiations".Should we follow that path then, several things would be subject to separate treatment such as Acess, Transfer, APPENDIX C. In that case there would be discontinuty between several major elements in Temp. Spec. which requires separate refernce document and the self contained and self sufficient elements of the Specification will not be retained

Regards

Kavouss

On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:18 PM Alan Woods <alan@donuts.email> wrote:

Dear team,

Please find attached the rationale document as requested, for the suggested removal and onward referral of the contents of Appendix C of the Temp Spec for your review in advance of tomorrow's meeting.

Kind regards,

Alan Woods

Alan Woods

Senior Compliance & Policy Manager, Donuts Inc.
The Victorians,
15-18 Earlsfort Terrace
Dublin 2, County Dublin
Ireland

Please NOTE: This electronic message, including any attachments, may include privileged, confidential and/or inside information owned by Donuts Inc. . Any distribution or use of this communication by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Thank you.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team