In preparing for tomorrow’s presentation, I realized that Question 5 to the Community omits an important word, “anonymized.” We should correct this.

 

Here is the Question from the Initial Report:

 

EPDP Team Question for Community Input #5

Does this guidance as written provide sufficient information and resources to Registrars and Registry Operators who wish to publish a registrant- or registration-based email address? If not, what is missing and why?

 

Taken literally, this might leave the impression that the Recommendation is to publish a standard email address.  In fact, our deliberations involved the publication of an anonymized (or more precisely, pseudonymized) email address.  I request that we correct this oversight both so that our intention is clear and so that the public comments solicited focus on the real topic to consider – whether to publish some form of an anonymized email address. 

 

I propose that we publish a corrected version of the Initial Report that inserts the word “anonymized” prior to “registrant- or registration-based email address” to correct this oversight.    

 

 

Kind regards,

Laureen Kapin

 

Acting Assistant Director

Division of Consumer Response and Operations

Bureau of Consumer Protection

Federal Trade Commission

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.