Hi All,

I would not use the term " disclosure/access to personal information" but would rather use the term " disclosure/access to nonpublic registration data". The reason for this is that by definition, some of the redacted data is not personal information, but was redacted because it was thought that in combination with other pieces of information it could lead to identifying the data subject.

Best Regards,

Hadia

From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2019 11:39 PM
To: Mueller, Milton L; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] [Ext] RE: For your review - Phase 2 Draft Approach

Apologies, it looks like the pdf conversion got rid of the ticks. We’ve replaced them with ‘X’ in the attached version.

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

From: "Mueller, Milton L" <milton@gatech.edu>
Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 15:35
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] RE: For your review - Phase 2 Draft Approach

Hi,

Looks like Janis and staff have been busy!

I have a question about Slide 7. There are no “X’s” or ticks in the columns for WS 1 and WS 2.

So I can’t tell what this means. Are we proposing (I hope) that WS1 meets on Tuesdays and WS2 meets on Thursdays? Or is this still open-ended?

--MM

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 2:07 PM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review - Phase 2 Draft Approach

Sending on behalf of Janis Karklins

Dear EPDP Team,

Following last week’s meeting, the leadership team and staff support have worked together on developing a draft approach for tackling phase 2. We hope this strikes a balance between the different views expressed and will form the basis for a detailed work plan with concrete milestones and deliverables. You will find attached a couple of slides that outline our current thinking in further detail, but here are some points I want to emphasize:

• This is a draft approach for discussion and review. Based on your input prior and our discussion during next week’s meeting, we will further iterate and detail our approach, the proposed work plan and accompanying timeline. This draft is for discussion that, hopefully, will lead to a consensual agreement.
• For the purpose of our exercise it is important to use definitions and terminology with the same understanding. We propose to develop and use working definitions without prejudice  to consensual outcome. Final definitions can only be developed once the Team has finalized its work and agreed on its recommendations.
• Based on the Team’s feedback in relation to the request to form a small team to engage with ICANN Org, I suggest to keep a plenary setting which will avoid creating a separate structure and ensure that everyone is part of discussion. Nevertheless, as this work on obtaining legal certainty is ongoing, I would propose that we deal with the charter questions and list of issues identified on slide 5 in an agnostic manner.  In other words, we should refrain at the outset to deliberate on whether or not a System for Standardized Disclosure should be centralized or not, but rather we should focus on the commonalities and where needed identify that differentiation may be required depending on which model is ultimately determined to be legally compliant with GDPR and workable. I also expect that this approach would help inform the engagement of ICANN org and DPAs.
• I appreciate that some of you may consider the timeline ambitious, but I’ve heard from almost everyone that the work on a System for Standardized Disclosure is a priority and as such I am committed to setting a target date for us to work towards. This will require your support and dedication. I am pretty confident I can count on that.

I look forward to receiving your feedback and would like to encourage you to focus your input on what, why and how things could or should be done differently, instead of simply saying that something cannot be acceptable or should not be done.

Janis Karklins

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.