Sounds like a good idea to me. An hour or so devoted to soliciting answers to questions about ICANN’s status as a data controller would be very important contributor to our work, in my opinion.

Others?

--MM

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Janis Karklins
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 5:12 AM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org; gnso-epdp-lead@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Question in preparation of the LA F2F meeting

Dear EPDP Team,

In planning for our F2F meeting in Los Angeles in September, I wanted to test the idea of carving out time as part of our agenda to meet with ICANN’s CEO and/or the Strawberry Team to get an update on the status of their activities in relation to the UAM based on the TSG model. 

As the questions that ICANN org is preparing for DPAs are expected to also help inform the EPDP Team’s deliberations, it may be of interest to get an update on the status as well as expected timeline and sharing any question from EPDP team directed to DPAs. Similarly, there may be further questions that the EPDP Team has for ICANN’s CEO that may impact the team’s decision-making further down the line, for example, in relation to the liability ICANN org is expected or willing to take on in a potential UAM. 

If there is interest in such an engagement, I would like to propose that we start a google doc that allows for the collection of specific questions so we can make sure that any engagement is structured to achieve a constructive outcome.  

I look forward to receiving your feedback.

JK