Dear All-

Thank you to the great work of Sarah, Kristina, Alex and others. We are looking to move this Rec forward and have worked to further clarify and edit the language - taking into account comments by all. Therefore, please find the attached proposed updated Rec. 12 for further discussion tomorrow.

Sincerely, Diane

Diane Plaut

General Counsel and Privacy Officer

Direct +1 646-899-2806 
diane.plaut@corsearch.com

220 West 42^nd Street, 11^th Floor, New York, NY 10036, United States
www.corsearch.com

Join Corsearch on   Twitter Linkedin Trademarks + Brands

Customer Service/Platform Support: 1 800 SEARCH1™ (1 800 732 7241)
Corsearch.USCustomerService@corsearch.com

Confidentiality Notice: This email and its attachments (if any) contain confidential information of the sender. The information is intended only for the use by the direct addressees of the original sender of this email. If you are not an intended recipient of the original sender (or responsible for delivering the message to such person), you are hereby notified that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance of the contents of and attachments to this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender at the address shown herein and permanently delete any copies of this email (digital or paper) in your possession.

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia@tra.gov.eg>
Date: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 at 5:35 AM
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>, Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>, "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Recommendation 12 - Reasonable Access

Hi all, the below comments are on behalf of Alan G

the proposal.

1. still does not set an expectation that although SOME requests may take the specified limit, not all should. Nor does it seem to imply that the Contractual Compliance has any ability to audit response times.

2. I find the reference to "GDPR legal bases" problematic. For example, under the current proposals, a registrar who is operating full outside of the EU mat redact information for legal persons and for natural persons not subject to the GDPR. What is the GDPR legal basis for requesting information on such registrations. According to GDPR there was no need for redaction to begin with, so a registrar can refuse to provide any results with full impunity.

From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2019 11:43 PM
To: Sarah Wyld; gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Recommendation 12 - Reasonable Access

Thanks, Sarah.

EPDP Team members, as this topic is included in the agenda for tomorrow’s meeting, please share any issues or concerns your group may have with the modified language prior to the meeting, if possible. Staff has taken the liberty to fix some formatting issues in the attached version (some of the sub-bullets did not appear properly).

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Organization: Tucows
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 12:31
To: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Recommendation 12 - Reasonable Access

Hello All,

As discussed on today's call, here is the proposed revised Rec. 12 from RySG/RrSG. Thank you.

-- 
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
 
 

On 1/31/2019 11:31 PM, Kurt Pritz wrote:

Hello Everyone: 
 
Thanks again for your perseverance. And - thank you in advance for your spirit of cooperation and compromise in considering the attached. We have spent the last few days reviewing the transcripts and other records of our recent discussions and then amending the Final Report Recommendations - taking into account the Initial Report Recommendations, the small team work, the conclusions in Toronto and these last several meetings. 
 
The Recommendations included here are: 
 
Recommendation 5 - Data elements to be transferred from Registrars to Registries
Recommendation 10 - Email communication
Recommendation 12 - Reasonable Access
Recommendation 14 - Responsible Parties
 
[Not included are Rec. 13 (sent earlier) and Rec. 11 and the Research Purpose (to be sent tomorrow.]
 
Each of these documents has a brief forward containing a description of the pertinent discussion and an explanation for choosing the wording in the Recommendations. They each then contain the Recommendation as originally written and a redline of the proposed recommendation based on the most recent discussions.  Please read the entire documents (they are not long), and not just the recommendation itself.
 
I am certainly not asking for you to stand silently by if you disagree with these Recommendations because they would negatively impact GDPR compliance. I am asking that you study the balancing that went into this and be ready to accept wording in cases where it does not match your own choice. 
 
Please review with your groups and return to us by Monday so that we can put any of these on the Tues/Wed/Thur agendas. 
 
Sincerely,
 
Kurt
 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team