Hi all,

As a partial answer to the questions below, I believe that we should start by

Analyzing the legal responses that we received so far,

Determining which items in the mind map are affected by the legal advices received

Reaching conclusions with regard to these items

Best

Hadia  

From: Gnso-epdp-team [mailto:gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 9:50 PM
To: gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Reminder - input on mind map and questions coming out of ICANN64 meeting

Dear EPDP Team,

As a reminder, please share any input you may have on the phase 2 mind map (see attached) by Thursday 28 March. In addition, your input is requested on the following questions:

· How should the team prioritize going forward?

· What next steps should be taken in relations to the dependencies identified?

· What should be the next steps in relation to the legal guidance to date?

· What is the target date for publication of the Initial Report that the EPDP Team is aiming to work toward?

Please share any feedback you may have with the mailing list.

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.