Margie, James, all,

In relation to the BC comment:

“RECOMMENTATION  REGARDING CONSENT Page 19 – Line 549  please delete  “as soon as commercially reasonable”.  Instead, this recommendation should track the dates for implementation under the transition plan that James and the registrars proposed in Toronto.”

Could you please provide further details in relation to what is referred to with ‘the transition plan that James and the registrars proposed’ and how that would affect the recommendation?

As a reminder, this new recommendation (modelled on the existing Temp Spec language) currently reads as follows:

“The EPDP Team recommends that, as soon as commercially reasonable, Registrar must provide the opportunity for the Registered Name Holder to provide its Consent to publish additional contact information”.

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.