![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7e63fafb24584cd04d81677090cb922b.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Alan Thanks May you pls provide evidence that payment could not be part of the deal? If yes then the attempt to commit cybercrime could be motivated or at least be hidden Kavouss Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Aug 2018, at 00:11, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> wrote:
Thomas, if we are going to have a productive discussion, let's keep this realistic. Payment data has never been a part of WHOIS and is a complete red herring here.
Alan
At 29/08/2018 05:20 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
If the purpose included the publication of all data of potential cybersquatters, including their payment data to allow for investigators to do their work efficiently, I think we would all agree that that would go too far. Yet, one could think that such action was covered by the purpose of 4.4.8..
_______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team