Dear All,

Please find the BC’s proposed accreditation principles for your consideration.

All the best,

Margie and Mark,

On behalf of the BC

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 10:16 AM
To: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #21 on Thursday 26 September at 14.00 UTC

Please note that an additional item has been added under item 3 (see below).

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 12:20
To: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] Proposed Agenda - EPDP Team meeting #21 on Thursday 26 September at 14.00 UTC

Dear EPDP Team,

Please find below the proposed agenda for the next EPDP Team meeting which is scheduled for Thursday 26 September at 14.00 UTC.

Best regards,

Caitlin, Berry and Marika

===============

EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #21

Proposed Agenda

Thursday, 26 September 2019 at 14.00 UTC

1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

1. RrSG proposed questions for ICANN Org (see https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2019-September/002504.html): Does ICANN have a clear preference on whether or not it will:

· Field these requests for non-public data

· Maintain its own RDS replica database

· Make a/the determination of the validity of the request

· Assume responsibility for this decision, in any scenario where ICANN doesn’t hold the data directly and must require a Contracted Party to respond to the Requestor (even if the Contracted Party disputes ICANN’s determination).

4. Accreditation (building block f & j – see attached) (45 minutes)

a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (Alex Deacon, Milton Mueller)

b) Review of “ideal accreditation model” proposals submitted by IPC, BC, SSAC, and GAC to cover their respective communities, outlining what the baseline             accreditation requirements could be as well as the attendant benefits of accreditation within the architecture of an SSAD

c) Feedback from EPDP Team

d) Confirm next steps  

5. Query Policy (building block i & l – see attached) – second/final reading (15 minutes)

a) Overview of updates made in response to input received during F2F meeting (James Bladel, Mark Svancarek)

b) Feedback from EPDP Team

c) Confirm next steps  

6. Retention and destruction of data (BB e) – Second reading (15 minutes)

a) Overview of updates made following first reading (see attached)

b) Feedback from EPDP Team

c) Confirm next steps

7. Lawful basis table – see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U9jt9nOHs9QMjWTDl7UPaT--9aD2lHZI/edit (10 minutes)

1. Initial review of input provided
2. Confirm next steps

8. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):

a) Thursday 3 October 2019 at 14.00 UTC

b) Confirm action items

c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any

Marika Konings

Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@icann.org

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.