Thanks, Benedict!
Let me reiterate my input, which I think needs to make its way into the document or in a covering note. To be clear, I am not questioning that we need to look into ways to enable ICANN to do research, but I am still unclear as to what their requirements are do to research.
*
More input from those conducting the research is required, especially on the questions:
What data is actually required for research purposes?
Would it not be sufficient to have pseundonymized data?
*
Best,
Thomas
Thank you for the update. I think it will be important to get this to the list for the full group’s consideration. Afterwards, I’ll make a few cosmetic updates and post on the wiki.
Thank you.
B
Berry Cobb
GNSO Policy Consultant
@berrycobb
From: Benedict Addis [mailto:bee@theale.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 15:38
To: Berry Cobb
Cc: farzaneh badii; Marika Konings; Thomas Rickert; Anderson, Marc; Emily Taylor; matt@brandsight.com; Amr Elsadr; Kurt Pritz; Caitlin Tubergen
Subject: Re: [Ext] Purpose O (Research) - informal small group
Dear Berry,
Thanks for your message, and thank you everyone for your time.
I’ve updated the workbook to incorporate the feedback from Farzaneh and Thomas.
Essentially, I have clarified that the registry will pseudoymise registration data before it is transmitted to ICANN.