Thank you, Sarah and all CPH Members for the timely response.

 

If any other EPDP Members have any feedback on the below proposals regarding purposes and user groups, please respond by Thursday, 28 November.

 

Thank you.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

 

 

From: Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com>
Organization: Tucows
Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 at 8:42 AM
To: "gnso-epdp-team@icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-epdp-team] For your review: purposes and user groups

 

Sent on behalf of the CPH team:

 

Hello Team,

Thanks for laying out these suggested options for how to approach the Purposes and User Groups.

We note that this would not generally be our preferred approach for addressing open issues, but because we did significant work on these topics already in plenary, we think that we can agree with the proposal for how to conclude these questions.

For User Groups, the building block in combination with the Accreditation building block should be sufficient to identify users and group them appropriately; we can therefore support the suggested text in the second bullet point.

For Purposes, we agree that no further work is required, and again support the second bullet point in that section.  

Yours Truly,

The CPH Team

 

 

-- 
Sarah Wyld
Domains Product Team
Tucows
+1.416 535 0123 Ext. 1392
 
 

On 11/21/2019 6:02 PM, Caitlin Tubergen wrote:

Dear EPDP Team:

 

Under the Team’s current review schedule, no time has been set aside to further discuss purposes and user groups. To that end, we wanted to test a proposed approach to these building blocks as outlined in the list of issues that was shared prior to ICANN66.

 

User groups:

“The EPDP Team expects that the question of user groups will be addressed through the accreditation policy; specifically, all requestors will need to be accredited, and accreditation will include identity verification, which may include user category/categories.” 

 

Purposes:

“As identified in building block a) criteria and content of requests, each request must include information about the legal rights of the requestor specific to the request and/or specific rationale and/or justification for the request, e.g. What is the basis or reason for the request; Why is it necessary for the requestor to ask for this data? The EPDP Team expects that over time, the entity responsible for receiving requests will be able to identify certain patterns that could result in the development of a preset list of rationales and/or justifications that a requestor can select from, while always maintaining the option for the requestor to provide this information in free form”.

 

Based on your feedback, the leadership team will determine when to discuss this further or whether the proposed approach has sufficient support to be incorporated in the draft Initial Report.

 

Please provide feedback by Thursday, 28 November.

 

Best regards,

 

Marika, Berry, and Caitlin

 



_______________________________________________
Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
Gnso-epdp-team@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.